Talk:List of bogs

Policy on redlinks in lists

An editor has restored a set of redlinked list entries with the comment that redlinks are good.

First, let me agree that in some situations redlinks ARE good. For instance, in a scientific article, a redlink to a species that does not yet have a WP article is a good thing: the species can readily be proven to exist, and an article will be welcome when it arrives.

The same is not necessarily true of possibly small, possibly WP:hoax items such as bogs. The function of the list here is to assemble for convenience a way of accessing the existing WP articles on those places which have already been established as notable. Each one should therefore have a bluelink (and probably a citation too). It is therefore inappropriate to include redlinks; articles should be written first, then linked. I'd like therefore to restore my changes unless there are convincing counter-arguments. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

In the absence of arguments to the contrary, I shall restore this change now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

And I reverted again. You really think removing U. S. National Natural Landmarks is necessary? The function of a list is to list things - the function of a category is to collate articles that already exist. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists. Rmhermen (talk) 03:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of bogs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100420091152/http://www.pitcherplant.org/papers/JosephPines.htm to http://www.pitcherplant.org/papers/JosephPines.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100810233037/http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/sna/index.asp?SNA=414 to http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/er/sna/index.asp?SNA=414
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070610062036/http://www.nature.nps.gov/nnl/Registry/USA_Map/States/Michigan/nnl/sb/index.cfm to http://www1.nature.nps.gov/nnl/Registry/USA_Map/States/Michigan/NNL/SB/index.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Where tf is ceanbrayy bog

where is it 2601:18F:902:7B90:742F:787C:553A:89BD (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Never heard of it. Why not write an article? Sarah777 (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC)