Talk:List of brachiopod genera
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of brachiopod genera article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Found possible citiation however source appears to be in Russian(?)
editThis source appears to be about fossils and mentions the fossil that requires a citiation on this wiki article. However as mentioned the source is in Russian and I can't deciefer it. But I thought I'd leave it here if it helps http://mmtk.ginras.ru/pdf/Manuals&Classica/1987.Iskopaemye.izvestkovye.vodorosli.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanikb (talk • contribs) 03:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
RE: Christianella
editThis isn't the only link that links to something completely irrelevant. Many of the links are faulty. The whole page needs reviewing! --95.146.180.32 (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
....Christianella given as one of the brachiopods links to a plant! Can somebody look into this? Prashanthns (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- I've disambigged the link. Abyssal (talk) 03:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Section unnecessary
editThe lengthy section on naming conventions and terminology is unnecessary and has little to do with the purpose of the page, which is simply to provide a list of brachiopod genera, and should be removed. The information there should be found by linking to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
extant genera
editExtant genera aren't actually bolded as the lead section indicates. --69.211.137.87 (talk) 06:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- Then bold them! :D Abyssal (talk) 11:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
- and so I did. dwergenpaartje
Disphenia
editDisphenia redirects to Cyathea, which is also a plant.
I am not qualified to review the list of genera, but I do know that a type of palm tree is not also a type of shelled marine animal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utgardsloki (talk • contribs) 16:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- It's been fixed. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 05:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Isogramma
editThe link to this genus leads to a page about moths. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.28.26 (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 05:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)