Talk:List of calligraphers
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Kdammers in topic Do not merge
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of calligraphers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removing notices
editAll these calligraphers are already present in Wikipedia. All but a small number even have individual articles. Therefore, I am removing the ref.-needed notices. Kdammers 01:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Change to Redirect
editThis was a manual list of calligraphers already present on Wikipedia. I converted this to a redirect to the calligraphers category, which automatically creates a dynamic list of all calligraphers. Maintaining a manual list is kind of pointless as this can be done automatically. Lexlex (talk) 23:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Agree for reasons given Saga City (talk) 07:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
- This article is useless and more trouble than it's worth. I agree with Lexlex. Asoer (talk) 12:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- How does a category automatically create a list? I would like to know for possible use with other subjects.Kdammers (talk) 09:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Do not merge
editI think a list of calligraphers is useful, but I think it would make the calligraphy article (there is not calligrapher article) too messy.Kdammers (talk) 09:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC)