Talk:Characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess

Love Interest?

I think we can all agree that Ilia is Link's love interest from the start of the game to at least the City in the Sky.

There are various quotes to support this, along with the Lanayru and Midna-shapeshifting scenes:

• Telma: "Don't you worry, honey! That girl's memory will come back!"
• Ilia: "You were always there... You were always beside me"
• Ilia: "You don't need to worry about me any longer. Whenever you return... I'll be waiting for you."
• Midna: (When taking the appearance of Ilia): "Are you sure you aren't forgetting anything important?"

Also, the manual states that Link is expected to be the next mayor of Ordona - the title that Ilia's father holds.

Besides Midna joking with Link at the very end of the game, I can't think of anything that could possibly be construed as another love interest - and it is made clear that Link is merely stunned, not lovestruck, and that Midna is joking.

Finally, however the ending cut-scene is interpreted (I for one see it as a temporary trip, perhaps to replace the Master Sword yet again, perhaps to actually give the sword to the Princess like he was supposed to at the beginning), it is just that - the ending cut-scene. So it does not effect a summary of the events of the game - it can be mentioned at the end, but if someone has a quality at least until the ending, then they have that quality throughout the game.

If anyone can think of a quote I'm missing, or a statement from the developers, that indicates that Link has a different love interest than Ilia, please share it. Otherwise, I'm really getting tired of the constant removal of that statement.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but that's all speculation. If I want to believe that's all them being close friends, I can, and it's not wrong per canon. Ilia never professes love, they don't kiss, they never so much as hold hands. Or touch, to my recollection.

Why is it necessary for Link to have a love interest? It's not proof that Link The game isn't for romance, unlike, say, FFX--it's for the adventure. If you're so tired of it, doesn't it make more sense to leave it out, rather than keep sticking it in there, when so many will challenge it?

It's removed for a good reason; it's fan speculation and theory, nothing more. And which manual are you reading? The only things that should be considered "proof" or "evidence" is something in the game or packaged in the game--it's never a first time that a manual gets something wrong, or invents something. It's notable, but shouldn't be concrete evidence. And, I'm pretty sure "mayor" is an electoral thing, not something that you inherit. I think it would be prudent to elect Hyrule's Hero as Mayor--but we have no proof either way whether it's an elected position or not, so again, not proof.

I'm not exactly sure what you're referencing about the end...our last shot of Link is him riding through through Faron Woods...which way is he headed? I seriously am not sure...but if it IS towards Hyrule Field, then I see irony in that you're willing to interpret a non-canon source as Link marrying Ilia, but just disregarding where Link heads. It's not like that's proof either, but it shouldn't just be tossed aside because it conflicts with Ilia/Link.

Basically, it's worth mentioning that there could be some romantic inclinations there (and I believe that Nintendo intended for us to interpret either way), but it's not canon, and it's speculation. The same can be said of Midna and Link. So, yes, I'm going to edit it back. 74.70.3.240 (talk) 03:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The prologue according to the official site, copied from the official Japanese site, and I think present in the manual, claims

"'Don't do anything silly. And come home safely,' Ilia says, revealing her true affection for Link."

It's removed for a good reason; it's fan speculation and theory, nothing more.

No, according to the edits, its usually changed because they think Midna deserves the title.

The mayor bit is from the official site as well, I believe, and about him before the game even starts. It's a small village, so no, history shows it's inherited. I'm not saying Link marries Ilia, but the last shot still doesn't matter - big deal, he leaves the village. He was supposed to at the beginning anyway.

Midna taunts Link with Ilia, everyone comments that she's so incredibly important to him, she's the one he chases after the most. [1] shows his reaction to finally seeing her again. [2] shows her shedding a tear when she remembers him, and can you honestly not see that as a romantic scene? The other children even pull Talo away so Link and Ilia can be alone together. Ilia says some clearly romantic things, especially taken from the cultural context of subtlety.

I don't see how Midna could possibly be a love interest, but fine.

If I add the quote from the site as a ref, will it satisfy your request for proper proof? I know most of it is observational, but this bit outright says he is her love interest, so it should be okay.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

The material from the official site in objectionable--or, at least, a lot of people pick and choose what's "proof" from it. Like it says Sheik is female:

The youth known as Sheik appeared in Hyrule after Link returned to the Temple of Time as an adult. Sheik always covered her face and muffled her voice to protect her identity, but Link soon learned that this helpful soul was in fact his good friend Princess Zelda. Her unusual dress and demeanor came from being raised as a Sheikah by her protector Impa.

...but most people choose to ignore that.

I don't support Midna and Link--I personally like that a relationship can be friendship, as close as possible without being romantic. But it's not like there's nothing to interpret there. Just like Ilia. Ah well. I'm content to leave it at "possible love interest", because that what it is. There has to be something more concrete than interpretations--it's only canon if not a soul can (reasonably) object to it. 163.153.64.48 (talk) 18:19, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

It's all speculation and opinion. It shouldn't be in the article because it's not specifically stated in the game. Ultimahero (talk) 10:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Not the "Great Hyrule Encyclopedia". The actual official site for tp, translated directly from the Japanese official site.

And this isn't a Zelda fansite - we don't get to throw out material based on our own opinions of its "canonicity". If it's published by a reliable source, it goes up.

It's directly claimed on the site, Midna uses it to taunt him at several points, and the Beth even does the "pull the kids away so that the lovers can get privacy" scene. I can see how this could be considered OR if there was no written proof, but the site outright says it, and that interpretation goes hand in hand with the events of the game.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 14:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

First of all, like I said above, I've seen that you don't believe Sheik is necessarily female. Yet, on the official site, it says she is. So where's the discretion?

The game is the only thing that should be considered canon. It's silly to think that sources--even Miyamoto has--don't get things wrongs. Even so, the section on the website indicates--and it's elusive, regardless--that Ilia has feelings for Link, not the other way around. I don't see why you can't leave it as a maybe, because it's a maybe. You can't say it's canon if it never happens in-game. Saibh (talk) 18:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't believe it because numerous other comments from the game and associated material directly contradict it, and the Great Hyrule encyclopedia is rife with mispellings and errors. That is a case of taking the more reliable source. Wikipedia should only consider "canonicity" if the canon contradicts the desired claim. It doesn't, ergo in this case Canon doesn't mean squat.

However, the Ilia thing IS NOT the same case. It's NOT on the Great Hyrule Encyclopedia, it's on the official TWILIGHT PRINCESS website and directly translated from the Japanese (I've checked this with the original Japanese site).

If the game strongly indicated or claimed that Ilia and Link didn't have feelings for each other, you'd have a valid complaint. But not only is it claimed on a summary for a site directly written for the game, by the game's designers (not just Nintendo in general like the Hyrule-pedia), but the game actually employs numerous romantic cliches.

I'm not saying it's canon from the game (even though it goes as far as it can without upping the rating or outright saying it) - I'm saying it's Nintendo's official stance on the matter. That's what wikipedia is supposed to report.

I'll qualify it by saying "Nintendo claims", but as worded it misrepresents the reffed source in order to submit to popular vote, not guidelined-consensus. I'll try to add more refs, too, but I can't understand why we should keep getting into arguments about canon if it doesn't actually contradict it.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Still, you are picking and choosing what to see and what not to see. Official is official, apparently, and since the official Zelda site says Sheik is female, that must mean Sheik is female, right? And how do you know who designed the website, anyhow?

:Listen, I am debating on it being factual. I'm getting on my last nerve because you're getting on your last nerve, but, oh my God, it is not canon. Putting a "possibly" in there makes it so that you are not indicating that it is canon. Actually, I reread your change, and I'll just leave it there.

Finally, like I said before, "true affections" is an ambiguous statement. It could mean she liked him better than we thought. It could be love. If it doesn't explicitly show it, then it's not canon. Hints are not enough. Interpretations are not enough. This is supposed to be an encyclopedia--what respectable encyclopedia assumes anything?

Huff! You're opposing it just as much as I am, so don't claim that I'm throwing a tantrum. Saibh (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Talking to UltimaHero, who removed the entire thing, source and all.

I am not "picking and choosing", because there's no contradiction. As I've explained numerous times, I'm using the quote straight from the official Twilight Princess site, not the Hyrule 'pedia (which hasn't been uploaded since OoX), which is also a direct translation of the official Japanese site, which has information in turn confirmed from the source material, like "Shadow Beast", "Celebrity Clerk", "Sword of Gobela/Death Sword", etc. If this quote, straight from Ninteno of both Japan and America, conflicted with the game, we would take the game as the authoritative source. There is no contradiction, ergo, no problem.

On the other hand, the Sheik problem has the game call Sheik a male by Ruto. That's it, canon-wise. Then we have the Hyrule Pedia (made only by Nintendo of America, and not maintained in several years), Super Smash Bros. (not even really gone over by the American or Japanese Zelda teams), and the official manga (with artistic license). These do not agree.

However, since the game's wording allows for Ruto to be right, or mistaken, we present it as such, and add that other references to the character have disputing opinions on the gender.

We report all those, and we're fine. That's what wikipedia does. On the other hand, if such a dispute did not exist between sources, we don't really need to phrase it like it does. We can do it anyway, but it's overkill, especially as obvious as the game makes the Ilia thing.

For the last bit - you're drawing at straws. You can't honestly look at the relevant scenes, and how the site describes the scene, and think they're talking about mere friendship (for one, the site establishes her as a close friend before the "revelation of true affections").Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 01:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, ;ljas;fj, it's not that big of a deal, just make it pleasingly ambiguous--which you have--and that's all I asked. 74.70.3.240 (talk) 02:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Anything taken out of the game is not specific enough and can be interpreted in different ways. As for the web site, can you please tell us where it's at? I look at the profile of Ilia and didn't see that, so I'm curious where it's at. And besides, the site is not created by Miyamot oor his team, so it's not offical. Ultimahero (talk) 20:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

...it's in the ref. You click on the "Story" button, and the site is a direct translation of this site, which is actually the best source of info we have on the game besides the game itself - it proved a lot of the "Killi, Hanna, Meshi" and "Twilit Assassin" stuff wrong.

If you could show where there's actual contradictions anywhere on the site, I'd concede the point. But so far, it just looks like throwing a fit about wanting to pick and choose which comments of Nintendo's you want to accept.

..and yeah, it's pretty damn official. It's even in the source code.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 23:20, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

No, I'm not throwing a fit. I'm simply trying to make the point that all of what's said can be interpreted in different ways. You may be right, but you still have to interpret what's said. And I didn't see anyting about her being called a "love interest". So, I'm simply asking you to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that your interpretation is accurate. Ultimahero (talk) 04:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

1. The site says Ilia has feelings for Link beyond that of a close childhood friend.
2. Ilia says to Link that he was always there beside her, and that she will always wait for him.
3. Midna taunting Link with Ilia's image, Ilia appearing as Link's companion in the Lanayru vision, and the cliche scene when Ilia get's her memories back, and Beth drags Talo away from the window.
4. Various characters speaking of Ilia, and only ever Ilia, being important to Link.

Are you honestly telling me that you can interpret the line from the site as meaning anything other than love interest? The meaning of the phrase used is pretty obvious, and it agrees with most of what was said in the game, and during pre-release info when everybody called her Link's girlfriend.

If you honestly think that summarizing "showing true affection", after already defining the character as a close childhood friend, as claiming a "love interest" at least from Ilia's side is unreasonable OR, then we might as well just stick to explicit quotes for everything, and have no summarization at all. It's excrutiatingly clear what they meant by that, and this is honestly starting to feel like searching for any way to deny Ilia and Link being love interests.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 05:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

As far as the quote from the site, I still haven't seen it. You said to look in the "story" link. I diidn't see one. There was a "Prolouge" link, so I assume that's what you meant, with the affection quote. It doesn't say that her feeling are stronger than friendship, but "revealing her true affection". The problem is that affection can mean different things. You're right in that it can be romantic love, but it can also be used to show just how deep thier friendship goes. As for everything in-game, that can be seen as merely friendship. And I'm not trying to stop them from being paired together. If people put this in about Midna, I'd have a problem with that, too, because it's all personal interpretation. I'm asking why it can't be taken as friendship. Ultimahero (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Right, it is in the prologue section.

af·fec·tion1 Audio Help /əˈfɛkʃən/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[uh-fek-shuhn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

–noun 1. fond attachment, devotion, or love: the affection of a parent for an only child.

It is explained just before the section about "true affection" that they were already childhood friends. As it is worded the "true affection" bit claims something more is there - and with affection's usual definition, and not having much else more to go to, it's clear that she views him as a love interest.

And no, at the very least, the "Ilia gets her memory back" scene cannot be seen as mere friendship. The other children are Link's friends as well, even according to the game script, yet Beth, the one most concerned with romantics already, pulls the other children away from the window so that Link and Ilia can be alone. It's an obvious trope that is only used for romantic scenes.

If you want, I will define the next bit as (barely) interpretation. But they're still pretty obvious.

Though it is commonly said in the game that Link is good friends with everyone in the village, Ilia is always singled out as the one most important to him - by the other villagers, by Midna, and by Telma. Also, she is singled out as the one he is worrying about - the other children, the village, and Hyrule itself are secondary until he returns Ilia's memory.

The quotes below are nearly dripping with romanticism:

• Ilia: "You were always there... You were always beside me"
• Ilia: "You don't need to worry about me any longer. Whenever you return... I'll be waiting for you."

I defy you to find a mere friendship where they say and do things like that.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 17:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I would agree that Link appears to have a greater affection for her thatn any of the other villagers. But, this can still be interpreted to mean that they are best friends. Sure, Link is friends with the other kids, but they're all considerably younger than him, while the other towns folk are all older. Ilia is the only one his age, so she's probably the one he can relate to the most.

The scene where Beth pulls the other kids away can be friendship. Link had already seen the other kids and reconnected to them. But if he and Ilia are best friends, then it's probably well known around the village the that's the case, so Beth could simply be giving two best friends a chance to connect again. And, on top of that, it was Link who went to all the trouble of trying to get Ilia her memories back. So for someone to go through all that, I would think that Ilia would want a chance to thank him. That doesn't neccesarily imply romantic love.

And again, you're right that affection can mean romantic love, but that's not alawys the case. A pet can show affection. That doesn't mean it's interested in it's owner romantically.

So, I know that you think it's pretty clear. But that is you're interpretation of things. You see it one way, I see it another, someone else sees it different than either of us do. It's not proper to insert one interpretation into the text when Wikipedia is facts only. If you can prove that you're right, like some line where they are shown to 'be in love', or some indisputable fact, then that's fine. Otherwise, it simply doesn't belong. Ultimahero (talk) 18:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

....really? If it was merely saying "affection", maybe. But it had already established that they were childhood, best friends. Basically, you're asking that them wording it as a revelation is actually just repeating what they said a sentence or two ago - it's worded like something Link didn't already know too well. The Beth scene - no. Cinematically and realistically, it cannot be interpreted as simple friendship. Ilia thanks him when there's other people in the room at other times, so it's not just that either. They are given privacy, and Ilia starts talking about how Link was always there for her, and she'll be waiting for him. It's nothing like a pet showing affection, and you are seriously stretching the meaning of the word to it's least meaningful to make that interpretation.

I've provided several such lines - where it is said that Ilia is the most important to Link, where it says he was always "there for her", where it says "she will wait for him". Those kind of things are not said by mere friends. Hell, it's stuff most boyfriends and girlfriends don't say to each other until they are pretty committed.

Fine, I reworded it to be completely, totally explicitly what is said. It seems to me to go against the whole point of wikipedia (reporting and summarizing what has been reported, as opposed to just being a quote reservoir), but at the least, there is really no possible way to argue against it, and it provides relevant information.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, sir. That seems fair. Ultimahero (talk) 02:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

As to ur last argument....thats wat my mother would say to me my girlfriend however says "NO!" when i do that. Ilia didnt fight it at all and the "official website" wasnt made by Nintendo. Now lets look at the game has Ilia so much as touched Link? No? i thought so yet Midna has touched him all the time like the part where she reveals shes a twili she was touching his cheek and ect if my friend did that to me id be going wtf. As for Talo being dragged off notice that Gor Goron and Renado were still in there......however were both sorta right. it has been revealed by Nintendo that this whole Love-thing is a easter egg for fans. and the yahve revealed that both Ilia AND Midna love Link heres a interview.

The official website for TP is made by Nintendo. Only someone in denial would claim otherwise. Ilia touches Link nearly every time they meet, and you can't claim that Midna riding on Link in wolf form is "romantic touching". The interview is fake (unless you can provide an official source for it, which you have yet to do), so stop posting it.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 03:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Interviewer:Im confused on the game The Legend of Zelda:Twilight Princess, i thought Link was supposed to love Zelda but im hearing different storys about Ilia and Midna can you explain?

Miyamoto:Ahh yes in this game we decided it would not be Zelda who Link is smiten with as it is obvious in nearly each game that he has fallen for her, of course there were a few she wasn’t in. no we decided to make it a little more difficult to figure out because this is half the fun of the games.

Interview:I see so its not Zelda......well who is it then? Midna or Ilia?

Miyamoto:As to that its kind of both.

Interviewer:Both?

Miyamoto:This may be confusing but notice how Links village is small and they need to populate to keep it ruuning. Well as you probably know Links is predicted to become mayor the only female his age is Ilia and shes the mayors daughter........well who do you think Link planned to have kids with? Everyone expected it including Link himself. then he met Midna of course he didnt like her off the bat quite the oppposite he didnt like being with her much toward the begining. By the time they were travelling to get the last fused shadow Link thought of her as a friend nothing more. Now here comes Zant he offers Midna a choice however she refuses and she cares for Link while hes hurt and when she is hurt by the light spirit Link saves her. Her additude toward Link changes dramaticly around the time they were in the temple of time is when Link fell in love. However remember that both Ilia and Midna loved Link

Interviewer:Hmmmm what about Lanayrus story? He thought alot about Ilia then.

Miyamoto:You must remember that he still expected himself to be wed with her and she was his best friend never-less so of course he thought of her.

Interviewer:Do you plan on bringing Midna back?

Miyamoto:The original plan was to make this the only game of this type i may have continued if the GameCube had stayed longer. However there are many people begging to see Midna come back and this is the only way so i may do it after all.

This keeps on getting erased just like ur quote hmmmm i wonder who does it -.-

Darkest-Link33 (talk) 03:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Erik

"I think we can all agree that Ilia is Link's love interest from the start of the game to at least the City in the Sky." That sounds about right i understand that Midna did show alot of feelings toward Link after the attack form Zant and touched him in err inappropiate ways but i think if he may have loved her around the twilight level and beyond dont bite this guys ass ok? Thetriforcehero (talk) 22:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

It is so clear that by the end Link at least has feelings for Midna, whether has some for both Ilia and Midna I don't know, but anyone here who knows when people are clearly falling for each other can see the OBVIOUS signs; Midna feeling up link's face and then both gazing deep into each others eyes and then Link going mental when Ganon breaks her helmet at end of game and when he chases after Midna having killed (maybe) Ganon and then looking at Midna's true form like a retard and then Midna saying 'link...I', leaving Link to look like an idiot and then... the list goes on. Ilia hardly appears in the game anymore, the game is about Midna and Link, they are bound to have some feelings for each other having saved each other countless times during the game. Sorry for the babble but I have to practice persuasive writing, I may have failed but hopefully sensible people will see the connections here... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.90.237 (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Please thoroughly read the bold text in the next section - It should explain why we cannot validity claims by using implications without proper references. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  00:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Huh? What does that even mean, and which bold bit? Are using you cannot assume Midna and Link have feelings for one another because it is never said directly to the audience or by nintendo?...Cause if thats the case, then ok.... we are all robots. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.69.90.237 (talk) 11:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Nintendo Interview Involving TPs "Links love-life"

I am currently showing a interview under the Midna section where Miyamoto reveals to many wondering fans "Who does Link love?"

Darkest-Link33 (talk) 00:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Erik

Buddy, the interview is a forgery, as far as I can tell. There is no record of it on the internet, it doesn't appear in any Nintendo Power's that I can see, and half of the claims it makes are outright wrong (like Link being smitten with Zelda in every game - she's not even in all of them!). You need to have a source for such claims, and they need to be sourced properly, not just plopped in the text where they disrupt everything.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Miyamoto:Ahh yes in this game we decided it would not be Zelda who Link is smitten with as it is obvious in nearly each game that he has fallen for her, of course there were a few she wasn’t in. ya thats part of it well i notice he says shes not so dont say that i DID say she was in every game and this was very recent acctually only 2 months ago. Your a mule who is stubborn and wont even read half of the opposing arguments. And everything u say is BS Ilia really acts more like a mother than a girlfriend

Yaaaaa i think Link belongs with Ilia too but that isnt a forgery its real theres another Interview you should have added thought its where Miyamoto admits that there really is no love life of links its all up to fans that Interview was jsut his opinionThetriforcehero (talk) 03:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)austin

Seriously, it's not anywhere on the internet, and not in any of my Nintendo Power's. I can only assume it's a forgery. By the way, the official site (which is written by Nintendo of Japan (which Shigeru RUNS), then translated by Nintendo of America) claims that Ilia has feelings for Link.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 03:45, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

NV=NintendoView and ty for telling me ill check69.104.53.155 (talk) 02:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

You're going to have to provide a link. The only site called "NintendoView" that I can find is a blank website with only adds on it.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Its on the NV site. No not the freewebs version. And you have your facts wrong the offical site wasnt made by Nintendo. Hmmmm were does it say it say that Ilia has feelings for Link? NO I BELIVE U I THINK SHE DOES TOO DONT GET THE WRONG IDEA! Cause it doesnt say that in characters 22:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

OH ya and one more thing stop being asses u guys seriously darkest,kryten listen to each toehrs arguments and dont be so effing vicious over a game. Also though i belive Ilia belongs with Link i listen to both sides of the story....true Midna touches him in ways Ilia doesnt and true i havnt seen them touch but that doesnt nessesary porve ANYTHING not even that interview is proof....yes i know its real so dont flip out ok? ive seen it too but nothing will prove it lets jsut stick to our beliefs and stop trying to convert ppl 22:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

1) What's NV, and why would the interview be there, and not mentioned on any Zelda fansite or official publication? 2) Read the section. It's in the prologue part of the website, and IS made by Nintendo. It's trademarked to Nintendo in several places. 3) I'd listen to his argument if it was actually from Miyamoto, and he bothered to verify it at all.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 01:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmmmm do u have proof its from nintendo? I mean most official sites arent made by the games creator. Its the offical site therfore they MUST have the Nintendo trademarks to prove its real. I read the prologue its there but.....i dont think it meant they are in love i mean i have affection for my sister mother father and friends this may be reffering to how she was acting previously toward Link. If they really thought they belonged together i think it would also be in character section. Anyway fact is i guess i dont have proof it ISNT from Nintendo its just rly unlickley the prologue is different than the one on the manual and Midna talks and sounds different and like i said its rare for them to make their own site ussually they choose one. Closet think i found To the Link/Midna/Ilia thing is a zeldapedia site as a reference to both Ilia and Midna 69.106.181.220 (talk) 02:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

...what? No. It's the official fansite, written and licensed by Nintendo of America, translated from the website written by Nintendo of Japan. They never "just pick fansites" - they're sites written and programmed by Nintendo's Advertising department, and exist to sell the game.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Fan Sites/Wikias are not considered reliable sources. Please cite your additions using official or reliable sources with citation templates. Unverified material can be challenged and removed under Wikipedia's attribution policy.--03:15, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Alright im going to dive into this fray. They never "just pick fansites" Well actully most of the time that IS wat they do. But its ok i know for a fact this was made by Nintendo its on both the NV site they reffered too and some NPs. Hmmmm if they did think Ilia and Link were in love it probably would be in the character section. If you read the prologue it says she shows her true affection. Now think wat had happened earlier she was yeliing her head off at Link cause of his horse, It says show her true affection I think they mean that she really DOES care about him. Last thing i find it biased to say Ilia acts like his mother. She acts more like a little sister "Just come home safely" sounds like a worried sister although admitingly it COULD be love. "You were always there you always looked out for me" sounds like a lil sister speaking to her big brother. Now lets thing about this Links 17 Ilia is 16 they have known each other for 16 years it makes perfect sense for Ilia to be like a younger sibling. Now as to whether i believe Ilia or Midna should have Link well both have their facts and faults. Midna does make fun of Link and Ilia. Ilia hasnt touched Link at all when Midna has in ways i wouldnt allow a friend to do let alone a friend ive only known for a week. Link shows concern that could be love for both. Ilia crys when her memory returns (it could be brother sister happiness). Midna crys when she broke the mirror (Maybe they did become great friends in that week together). The I... could have just been a English fault. The I... could have been another clue as its rumoured. It could be any one of them it could be.......TELMA! jk. 67.117.26.171 (talk) 14:07, 24 May 2008 (UTC)Kyle

"Alright im going to dive into this fray. They never "just pick fansites" Well actully most of the time that IS wat they do."

They have never picked a Zelda fansite to be a game's official site, and you need to back something like this up.

"Hmmmm if they did think Ilia and Link were in love it probably would be in the character section."

Probably not, since it's story information, and could be considered a spoiler. The character section is all stuff to introduce the characters.

"If you read the prologue it says she shows her true affection. Now think wat had happened earlier she was yeliing her head off at Link cause of his horse, It says show her true affection I think they mean that she really DOES care about him."

It says that after calling him his childhood friend. Therefore, it would be redundant for it to have the meaning you suggest.

"Ilia hasnt touched Link at all when Midna has in ways i wouldnt allow a friend to do let alone a friend ive only known for a week."

1) Yes, Ilia has, especially in the romantic scene where she regains her memory. 2) Do you ever see Link enjoy these touches? Or do you see her doing it to annoy him, like she does at the beginning of the game? They don't start off as friends, they start off as forced allies, and they stay like that until Midna shows compassion for Hyrule.

I'm not demanding that the article says Ilia is Link's love interest - as obvious as I personally believe it is, I understand verifiability. All I'm asking is that instead of putting personal opinions into the article, you put information sourced to reliable sources. If you want to use an interview, you need to prove that it's a real interview with Miyamoto.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 05:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

• Cough* ahem err most of ur counterarguments WERE opinions i need to go right now so i only have time to say maybe 3 things. 1)I will rewatch the Ilia scene to be sure. 2)I highly doubt that Minda touched Links cheek in the gerudo desert to annoy him she seemed alot more serious at that point of the game (this was when she was revealing her ancestors and when she asks again for him to accompany her to the mirror. 3)It states in the prologue Ilia is his childhood friend.....almost like their expecting u to read this first.67.117.26.179 (talk) 13:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Kyle

...okay, seriously, stop being such a dumbass. Do you see me putting my personal opinions into the article? No, you see me only putting in a quote directly sourced to the official website. 2) I highly doubt she was doing it to flirt, either, since she was AN IMP. 3) ....yeah. Which is why it means that the "true affection" bit is almost certainly not just saying they're friends. And finally 4) Either provide an effing source for the interview which verifies it as legit, or go away.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

UHHHH i dont wanna get in this so ya im going to say one thing and im leaving dont bother responding cause i wont respond back. Ok severall of the poeple against you said Nintendosview as the source i mean its a well known site and has every interview for every Nintendo game. Lastly ya u wont take "Ilia isnt it" for a answer u seem completly determind to make it so Ilia is the one Link wants even though so far everyone who has been on this disagrees with you and has given you a source witch you keep asking for yet you ignore.68.127.50.241 (talk) 19:24, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Nicole

Ok i wasnt going to get into this but ur being a asshole u havnt borught any fact at all u have given sites and quotes but these quotes dont support ur theroy. You say This is wat this quote means and ect thats really nothing more than a opinion however they have facts straight from Nintendo to support their theroy.

Look at the damn article. The ONE THING I have inserted on this topic is a line straight from the official website. YOU (I don't believe your BS that all these similar IP's are really just tons of anonymous people who happen to have your exact views) have not provided any links backing your claims up. In order to add information to an article, especially if it is contested, it MUST be sourced. That is ALL I am asking - give a link to an article which verifies your claims as official fact, and I'll post that Midna has had babies with Link. That's all I'm asking here.

As for the article, which you keep reverting -

1. The first edit ("he dreams of") is used on the official site. However, since he seems to change these goals throughout the game, it's not a very safe claim to make. However, it can stand, since it can be sourced.
2. The second edit (he is the main character in all Zelda games) is wrong, because this is not the same Link as in all Zelda games. This is the Link in only one game, and even further than that, all of his information as a recurring series character is supposed to be presented on his main article, not here. This page is for the character's specific to this game.
3. Your third edit has NO SOURCES, and as it is contested, SHOULD NOT BE INSERTED WITHOUT THEM.
4. Your fourth edit (in the references section) is incredibly bad formatting, and not how the references sections work.

Except for the first (which is a minor content dispute, since that wording is used on the site), all of these edits are against guidelines, and you're willful reinsertion amounts to vandalism. If you continue, you will almost certainly be banned. All you need to do is to provide a link which verifies the interview as factual, and you can have your "Link x Midna".Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

For the love of god severall of us have told you the site over and over and over but im not going to keep on repeating it to you, you will jsut ignore it. You havnt given a reliable source either. YES I SAW THE LINE but it doesnt mean they r in love thats just your opinion if they are in love. No it would not be a spoiler to put "Ilia loves Link" in character section as everyone would read the prologue first.

Spoiler EX:Midna is actully the twilight princess69.106.221.103 (talk) 13:44, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Kyle

NEW UPDATE:Ok guys i cant believe u have nothing better to do then stand and wait at the Wikipedia articles and wait for somone to change them so u can change them back. I have added a new update to both Midna and Ilia articles both the same and both at the bottom and nobody can deny they are true, Katrieh however insists this war goes on and has been upset at these changes.Darkest-Link33 (talk) 15:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Erik

Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources: users of Wikipedia cannot add any controversial content to an article without backing it up with a reliable source such as a book reference or a link to a reliable website. Kariteh (talk) 15:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Not everything needs proof u piece of BS. Dude you know its true that many zelda fans think Midna and Link love each other and u know that man think Ilia and Link love each other. You apparently just enjoy being a bitch on the internetDarkest-Link33 (talk) 15:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Erik

I'm sorry but it's not a question of "proof". This is not a matter of people believing you or not believing you, it's just that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and thus has policies and guidelines, one of them being that contents must be attributed to reliable sources. If you refuse to make your edits comply with these guidelines, please refrain from editing at all. Kariteh (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Also please avoid using multiple accounts and IP addresses, as per Wikipedia:Sockpuppets. Kariteh (talk) 15:30, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Want a source? go to youtube and it has loads of LinkxMidna tributes and LinkxIlia tributes i dont need a offical site as what im saying counts on the opinions of others and this is wat shows it stop trying to make people argue over this crap its annoying as hell.Darkest-Link33 (talk) 15:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Erik

But just to humor you:

• Google Search for "Link loves Midna": 57300 results
• Google Search for "Link loves Ilia": 246000 results.

Sooo...uh...how the hell are you getting the idea that LinkxMidna is the most popular?Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Editing

Lets face it alot of biased editing is coming all around. Do not Undo something unless its the following.

1)Has no evidence

2)Has evidence that doesnt support them

3)Claims something as a FACT and uses a unreliable site

4)Claims something as a OPINION and uses a unreliable site

5)States point blank that Midna/Ilia and Link are in love lets face it Nintendo isnt going to go up point blank and say it

6)Forgery

7)They made the supporting site themselves

8)They deleted something that didnt have anything on the above

9)writen things that have nothing to do with the topic.

Ok for those who dont completly understand what is a reliable site allow me to explain.

If you are trying to prove something you must first find a official site then find the quote that suppots your theroy NOTE:your quote must not be in confusion. It must Clearly say what you say is true. You cant say "well i THINK this means this" or something like that.

If your going for OPINION you must clearly state it. Chances are your going for others opinions like fans. Therfore a official site isnt the way to go for this as a official site cant speak for all fans. You must find a site where the fans themselves leave their opinions. Ex: IliaxLink site. the important thing is that the fans clearly state thats their opinion so it doesnt have to be a fan site as long as some fans say that is their opinion. Remember this is opinion you cant say that your opinion is true unless you prove fact.

one last reminder DO NOT UNDO ANYTHING UNLESS IT FALLS INTO THOSE CATAGORYS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetriforcehero (talk • contribs) 00:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but fansites are not acceptable sources, because they are 1) Original resource, and 2) Do not by any means represent the entire community. Whether or not there are Ilia x Link site's, that is not encyclopedic content. It needs to be released from the official source, or covered in a reputable source such as IGN News or the New York Times. This isn't an issue of biased editing - this is simply an issue of one side completely refusing to adhere to the WP:V guidelines which are not optional on this wiki.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 01:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

• unencyclopedic content, unacceptable sources. to add "fans think", you need to produce professional polling, or else I could add "fans think Midna is a cockchugger", and source it to a random blog. You have a point but its either this or do u wish to continue with the fat MidnaxLink or IliaxLink argument?

as for your last comment you have a point however notice that it doesnt say all it says many and its true too many fans DO think Midna is a cockhugger and many fans DO think Ilia is a annoyance i dont belive in either one of those but some zelda fans do. This is on both Midna and Ilia pages I find it fair and its really not doing any harm its preventing all these edits. Thats the main reason why i want it to stay. Feel free to open up any concerns you have about it thoughThetriforcehero (talk) 02:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

Also can u give me a link on the wiki rules where you cant use fan statements and ectThetriforcehero (talk) 02:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

First off, don't revert other editor's changes unless you are familiar with the guidelines. They are plainly in opposition to that passage.

WP:V

"Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."

"Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article and should be appropriate to the claims made: exceptional claims require exceptionally high-quality reliable sources."

"Tiny-minority views and fringe theories need not be included, except in articles devoted to them."

"In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny involved in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the evidence and arguments of a particular work, the more reliable it is."

"Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for fact-checking. Such sources include websites and publications that express views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, are promotional in nature, or rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions."

"Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, forum postings, and similar sources are largely not acceptable."

"Claims of consensus must be sourced. The claim that all or most scientists, scholars, or ministers hold a certain view requires a reliable source. Without it, opinions should be identified as those of particular, named sources."

"Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research. See Reliable sources for explanations of the terms "factually inaccurate material" or "unverifiable research"."

"Linking to YouTube, Google Video, and similar sites: There is no blanket ban on linking to these sites as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page (which would happen infrequently). See also Wikipedia:Copyrights for the prohibition on linking to pages that violate copyrights. Therefore, each instance of allowance is on a case-by-case basis."

WP:NOR

"Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by a reliable source. "Original research" is material for which no reliable source can be found. The only way you can show that your edit is not original research is to produce a reliable published source that contains that material. Even with well-sourced material, however, if you use it out of context or to advance a position not directly and explicitly supported by the source you are also engaged in original research; see below."

"In general the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Material that is self-published, whether on paper or online, is generally not regarded as reliable, but see this section of Verifiability for exceptions."

WP:WEASEL

"With weasel words, one can imply a statement is true when it may be no truer than its inverse. For example, an editor might preface the statement "Montreal is the best city in the world" with a disclaimer: "some people say that Montreal is the best city in the world". This is true: some people do say that Montreal is the best city in the world. The problem is that the reverse is true as well (some people say Montreal is not the best city in the world, and some go further and say that it is the worst), and it is thus easy to write a misinformative, slanted article composed of nothing but 'facts' like these, using Wikipedia to spread hearsay, personal opinion and propaganda. All it takes is for somebody to add "Critics have asserted that..." to a statement, and there is a danger that the casual reader will take their word for it."

"The Many people think... type of statement is often a thinly-veiled bandwagon fallacy. It wasn't put there to establish the context of the following statement (and naturally enough, it doesn't do that in the least bit). Rather, it serves to inspire awe and lead the reader's train of thought along the lines of, "oh, many people say this, obviously this must have a semblance of credibility to it"."

Second off - all the information on this page is derived from the official material, or reputable, reliable sources. If you want to add something like "Many fans think", you need to

1. Explain why this is relevant to explaining the character's in the context of them being characters of the game,
2. Specify EXACTLY how many fans think this, and what percentage of the fanbase this is,
3. Cite this to a professional, reliable source, and
4. Do exactly the same for ALL differing opinions.

This is all the most basic policies, which I shouldn't even be have to explaining to you. Add to that that the section was CLEARLY put in there to advance someone's personal fan-gasm, and that it was originally a completely dishonest forgery, and I'm not quite sure why I'm even having to reply to this kind of thing - you should understand quite damn well why this simply doesn't belong on wikipedia. Would you expect to see such a passage in the Encyclopedia Britannica, or Encarta?Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 02:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Too much writing ahh lol, i only read around the topish area about it having to be a reliable source....well ya for fans opinions Youtube is reliable. forgive my laziness do me a favot though to make it easy type the part that you want me for SURE to read in italic....sry im being rude and not buying it off the bat i jsut find it fishy that this guy also put the same thing on the Ilia charcter (different vid) and ur not deleting that along with the Midna part. Though i think we should encourage IliaxLink i think it might actully to be best to take out all hints of loveThetriforcehero (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

Every part of those is important for you to read. It is not my job to walk you through the basic policies (which you are supposed to know, before editing at all), especially if you are going to be so lazy and ignorant as to continuously revert against ridiculously clear consensus. Read the whole damn thing, or shut up and go away. And no, I didn't leave any youtube sources for the Ilia character, what the hell are you babbling about? The only thing not straight from the game there is straight from the official site. Hell, the guidelines explicitly say that if an addition turns out to be controversial, it MUST be discussed on the talk page, and it MUST prove how it doesn't violate the guidelines.

This is not about "encouraging" any fan-ship. This is about verifiable, reliable, and encyclopedic info - the only things in the Ilia section are straight from Nintendo. All we've asked since the beginning is that you prove that the "interview" is not a forgery - all the other editors I've talked can't find hide nor hair of the "interview", nor the alleged source.

This entire thing is getting incredibly tiring, and any person with half a brain wouldn't be trying to "get away with it" in the first place - you want to support shipping so damn bad, go create a fansite. This is not the place for your fan-gasming.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok ok ill read it when i get home its just that i dont have a great vocabulary so i was finding some of it hard to read. To others who read this....you need to stop being so damn viscious i got a email saying you would kill my family if i continued....wowThetriforcehero (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

Im sorry but "Linking to YouTube, Google Video, and similar sites: There is no blanket ban on linking to these sites as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page. what you have stated makes me feel its right more than ever, perhaps he should have added a percentage of fans but how would he ever know? I am 15 and was always bad at vocabulary so some of this i do not understand if u would like to put Italic quotes on the part you think helps your argument do so. Your being very viscious and im getting the idea it was you who emailed me. I understand you want IliaxLink i want it too but we have to be fair. Last thing i never said u put the article of Ilia with the youtube source darkest did, I said i find it fishy that you didnt delete that when it had the same sourceThetriforcehero (talk) 22:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Austin

Err wats going on? lol fan fight for Linkx stuff well both sides have facts and made sense so far...Im not choosing sides yet because i dont know if its Midna or Ilia and i dont bother pondering it that much ill jsut watch for now lol and see who makes the better arugments and who makes more senseGoldenWolfy (talk) 23:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Tera (My real name is Wolfy =) lol)

As a general comment, I would like to remind everyone that sock puppetry, or attempting to use several accounts by one user, is punishable with a permanent ban. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  00:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Ooooook if you think im somone u know feel free to check my IP and area code and if you think i edited and wrote a differnt IP check history to be sure if i didnt change my IP then there will be nothing thereGoldenWolfy (talk) 00:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Love Tera

Hey ty for that ill check now.....i know ur not darkest tera as you wouldnt be speaking.....but theres a few others who area codes id like to check —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetriforcehero (talk • contribs) 01:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I think triforce hero was right when he said you should delete all signs of Midna and Ilia love i read this. 'Often, such fringe theories are promoted in order to push a particular point of view, which violates our rules on neutrality. As the guidelines given at Wikipedia:Fringe theories state, theories outside the mainstream that have not been discussed at all by the mainstream are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Wikipedia aims to reflect academic consensus' I read it as i was seeking help to understand wikipedia from what i can tell everything you guys are doing INCLUDING the Youtube Video and INCLUDING the TP official site.....feel free to correct meGoldenWolfy (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Love Tera

No. I removed his additions to Ilia as well, so you need to get your head out of your ass about that. There is no ban on linking to youtube as long as such links follow the other guidelines on this page - EXCEPT THEY DO NOT. You are adding a section "to prove a point", and it is written as such. I do not "want" Ilia x Link, or I would be trying to insert the same crap you are, wouldn't I?

Accusing others of harassing behavior (especially threatening e-mails) is a very serious accusation, and is not to be used lightly - and since I can verify that it wasn't me, you'd be wise to stop accusing me of it.

How am I being vicious? I'm telling you to stop your prohibited behavior of vandalizing the page, and simply asking you to provide an acceptable source.

Fine, even though the burden of proof is on you, not me, I'll put the part's important for you to read in italics:

WP:V

"Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."

"Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article and should be appropriate to the claims made: exceptional claims require exceptionally high-quality reliable sources."

"Tiny-minority views and fringe theories need not be included, except in articles devoted to them."

"In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny involved in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the evidence and arguments of a particular work, the more reliable it is."

"Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for fact-checking. Such sources include websites and publications that express views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, are promotional in nature, or rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions."

"Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, blogs, forum postings, and similar sources are largely not acceptable."

"Claims of consensus must be sourced. The claim that all or most scientists, scholars, or ministers hold a certain view requires a reliable source. Without it, opinions should be identified as those of particular, named sources."

"Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research. See Reliable sources for explanations of the terms "factually inaccurate material" or "unverifiable research"."

"Linking to YouTube, Google Video, and similar sites: There is no blanket ban on linking to these sites as long as the links abide by the guidelines on this page (which would happen infrequently). See also Wikipedia:Copyrights for the prohibition on linking to pages that violate copyrights. Therefore, each instance of allowance is on a case-by-case basis."

WP:NOR

"Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by a reliable source. "Original research" is material for which no reliable source can be found. The only way you can show that your edit is not original research is to produce a reliable published source that contains that material. Even with well-sourced material, however, if you use it out of context or to advance a position not directly and explicitly supported by the source you are also engaged in original research; see below."

"In general the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Material that is self-published, whether on paper or online, is generally not regarded as reliable, but see this section of Verifiability for exceptions."

WP:WEASEL

"With weasel words, one can imply a statement is true when it may be no truer than its inverse. For example, an editor might preface the statement "Montreal is the best city in the world" with a disclaimer: "some people say that Montreal is the best city in the world". This is true: some people do say that Montreal is the best city in the world. The problem is that the reverse is true as well (some people say Montreal is not the best city in the world, and some go further and say that it is the worst), and it is thus easy to write a misinformative, slanted article composed of nothing but 'facts' like these, using Wikipedia to spread hearsay, personal opinion and propaganda. All it takes is for somebody to add "Critics have asserted that..." to a statement, and there is a danger that the casual reader will take their word for it."

"The Many people think... type of statement is often a thinly-veiled bandwagon fallacy. It wasn't put there to establish the context of the following statement (and naturally enough, it doesn't do that in the least bit). Rather, it serves to inspire awe and lead the reader's train of thought along the lines of, "oh, many people say this, obviously this must have a semblance of credibility to it"."

Now, to reiterate: DO NOT RE-ADD THE SECTION TO THE PAGE UNTIL YOU CAN DEMONSTRATE HOW IT PASSES EACH OF THESE GUIDELINES. DOING SO WITHOUT SUCH CONSENSUS WILL BE CONSIDERED VANDALISM, AND YOU WILL BE BLOCKED FROM EDITING.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 04:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Ur both vandalizing, it goes against the nurtality rules of wikipedia and ur BOTH using fringe theroy YES U TOO Krytern infact that Youtube is only a 50% chance of it being fringe theroy as he is supporting both sidesGoldenWolfy (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Please erase it thank Tera

...seriously, stop sockpuppeting and blatant lying. And no, I'm not vandalizing - I have both consensus and the guidelines behind my edits. Here's the deal: explain how your addition does not violate the given guidelines, or GO AWAY. This is non-negotiable - the addition must pass those guidelines to be included.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 17:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Funny how 3 accoutns have ur IP,interesting anyway your breaking the fringe theroy rule so quit trying to take away the integrity of Wikipedia thank youGoldenWolfy (talk) 22:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Tera

As a completely uninvolved editor, I'd like to drop in for a moment before things get out of hand. Everyone, please keep in mind that civility, no personal attacks, and assume good faith are also key Wikipedia policies. I see ad hominem attacks coming from both of you here, and I see productive discussion quickly disappearing. This is doing no one any good, so please: discuss article content or the reliability of sources all you want, but don't turn it into a flame war. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 22:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Your right im sorry, i was upset that he was telling lies and being rather rudeGoldenWolfy (talk) 23:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Love Tera

...I'm being rude? I've clearly explained what the problem with the section is from the beginning - you are the one that started attacking other editors, calling them liars and idiots. Citing the exact line from the official website is in no way "Fringe Theory" it was created specifically by the parent company as the intended interpretation of their work. How you interpret that as fringe I don't know - you might as well claim that the architect's claim that the Lincoln Memorial's subject is Lincoln is fringe as well.

You have yet to even show what you claim I've been lying about - There is no youtube source in Ilia's section that was left in, only one from the official site. There never was, as far as I can tell. If you think it's rude to tell you that your edit is completely in violation of the editing guidelines, then I'm sorry, but wikipedia isn't the place for you.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 05:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

No i was reffering to the fact that u keep on swearing like a sailor and keep sending threatening emails. I saw the site doesnt help prove ur point in anyway, read prologue and character in now did it say they were in love —Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldenWolfy (talk • contribs) 14:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

...okay...where have I "sweared like a sailor"? And since I know for a fact that I haven't sent any e-mails in the last two weeks, I'm a bit tempted to suggest that you're making this e-mail thing up.

"I saw the site doesnt help prove ur point in anyway, read prologue and character in now did it say they were in lov"

...what? What "point" am I allegedly trying to get across? That the site says she has true affection for him? That's pretty explicitly there. I claimed that it was clear they were in love maybe a month or two ago, and withdrew that because I accepted the policies on verifiability and did not act like a horse's ass. All you've been asked to do, since the beginning is to respect the non-optional editing policies and provide a reputable source for your claim. You started with a blatant forgery, apparently refused to back it up, and are now claiming some nonsense about fan-made shipping videos being adequate proof for the claim being encyclopedic and notable. All you have to do is to accept that such sources and argumentative phrasing are not acceptable in a wiki article, and look for a reputable source.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 22:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Come back when you learn to read properly the site said that meaning this

Though it seems Ilia hates links guts she really does have some sisterly affection

and god knows how you thought it meant this

They are in love but we will not be sensible enough to put it in the character section —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkest-Link33 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh goodness, I am seriously having trouble typing due to all the laughing.

1. The site says "Ilia is Link's childhood friend"
2. Then it says "..."revealing her true affection for him"
3. Even barring the obvious implication, I didn't keep trying to insert "Nintendo has proven that Link loves Ilia" - I inserted only what was explicitly said on the original site.

Do you realize how silly it is for you to be claiming I'm lying about that line, when I've put exactly what was said? Especially in the context of what you keep putting in the article? Or how funny it is that you keep trying to imply that if it's not in every section of the site, it can't possibly be on purpose? Honestly, at this point I'm starting to think you're doing this is a joke, and you don't actually believe any of this "LinkxMidna" stuff.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 01:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

No it said the affection line first dont lie ok? seriously you dont need to resort to lying69.105.11.163 (talk) 03:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)33 (you know who on his lil sisters cpu)

....no? It calls her his childhood friend when it first mentions her? Seriously, this has to be some elaborate joke, there's no way anyone is this delusional.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 01:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Ur Ilia search commnet ever realize there are billions of people with the name Ilia try this to be accurate and not get those results

"Link loves Midna" (with the ")

"Link Loves Ilia" (with the ")

Midna:113

Ilia:5

Think its a fluke? ok then another varation

"MidnaxLink" (with ")

"IliaxLink" (with ")

Midna=1,520

Ilia=196

I used google btw incase ur using yahoo which i havnt checked the results for69.104.53.155 (talk) 02:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)You know who on his dads cpu (sisters IP banned)

Using the quotation marks removes many legitimate hits, including several that used it as the title of the page. It's much simpler to just add "Zelda" to the search words, to rule out ones unrelated to the game.

"Link loves Ilia 'Legend of Zelda'": 17800 results

"Link loves Midna 'Legend of Zelda'": 17400 results

But then, we could argue about how to insert quotation marks, what words to add all day - the simple point is that it is ridiculous, without hard polling, to claim that "most/many fans" support "Link x anyone" shipping, not only because such weasel words are prohibited by the guidelines, not only because it really has nothing to do with the character in the context of the game (and so would be useless for someone coming here to learn about the game's characters), but because there simply is no consensus among the fans.

No one here is going to stop you (well others with your view, I guess, since technically you're not allowed to edit anymore due to disruptive behavior) from adding information that could support a "Link and Midna" view, so long as it has reputable, reliable, and verifiable sources, and is phrased in an encyclopedic tone. That's been the problem since day one, and we've told you this. All you have to do to add such evidence is to find a reputable article on the game or characters, or find a quote from Nintendo, and you can insert "Link x Midna" evidence to your heart's content.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 05:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Is there truly point into this as it will be deleted anyway? just a FYI u brought up the google search so dont point fingers. Anyway fact is Nintendo isnt going to come clean meaning that they will never say the sentance "Link loves Midna" or "Link loves Ilia" there are many sites like the one you gave for Ilia that say Link and Midna get a close bond and she has affection for him but that could mean anything it doesnt nessesaryly mean love i could use any site that says they have a close bond and say it means love but wheres the proof? Point is ur site doesnt come clean either.67.121.234.1 (talk) 19:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Guess who

...okay, let's go through this again.

1. I'm not pointing any "fingers" about the Google search - it was meant to illustrate how their's no clear consensus among the fanbase, as you were trying to imply.
2. Nintendo has actually said stuff like "Link loves Zelda" before, and portrayed it quite clearly. They did that with Marin in the game itself, as well.
3. There are not "many sites like the one I gave" because that was the official site, created by Nintendo of Japan and translated by Nintendo of America. It is NOT "just a fansite with Nintendo approval".
4. AGAIN, nothing in what I added claims that Ilia loves Link". It claims that Ilia has a "special affection for Link", which is explicitly claimed on the official website. If you're interpreting that as love, that's on your side, not mine.

Again, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO is to stop throwing a tantrum, and find a quote from a reputable or official source that we can use, and you can have your precious "Link x Midna" evidence on this page. So long as you refuse to do that, it is only YOU who is making it hard for you.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 20:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Can someone unlock this article?

Flamewar between one editor and fans. One side is telling the other the rules about Wiki and they're ignoring it with blah blah blah whine whine blah.

This is embarrassing.

Just some general information about what the LoZ thinks of romance in the franchise: Club Nintendo interview, translated, thus there is no 'fresh' original version for you to Google:

   Interviewer: We have received several emails in which our readers ask: Will Zelda and Link ever be involved [romantically]? [laughs] I’m sorry, but we had to ask.
   Eiji Aonuma: [laughs] Good question. Well, as you already know, we are now dealing with a teenage Link, and as you know, teenagers are very emotional beings, so there are definitely possibilities of seeing Link showing his feelings towards the princess. But honestly, we don’t know what the future holds.

   Interviewer Will we see a charming and affectionate romance [between Link and] the princess?
   Eiji Aonuma: Well, we’re creating an adolescent storyline and we try to present it how it should be; in fact, if you played it – or will play it – you’ll notice that the way Link holds the sword is much cooler than how he used to do it. Link will now do things in a way that will make him look more confident and liberated. And yes, it’s true that teenagers have these relationships — and we would love if it could happen with the princess – but I can’t talk about anything yet.  

Interviewer: Does Link have a girlfriend?

   Miyamoto: If it was Princess Zelda, it would be great. However, this time Navi [the fairy] is jealous of Zelda. So within the story, Navi feels something for Link.

These are general knowledge interviews most people have read so I'm not going to source all of them. Especially since none of them are going on the article. These are things you need to keep in mind when debating this fanship edit war that really pleases no one, not even the reader. --HeaveTheClay (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Err u DO realize this was way b4 Midna and Ilia were even thought of —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetriforcehero (talk • contribs) 23:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Only one of them is. And that's Miyamoto's statements about Zelda in OoT. The rest are from TP's director Eiji Aonuma. So you're quite wrong. --HeaveTheClay (talk) 03:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Made by the director true but still this was b4 TPThetriforcehero (talk) 14:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Austin

Meaning of Kidnapping

"The reason for the kidnappings was never revealed and was seemingly done on the behalf of his master". is in the article, but the goblins are seen observing the wrist/back of the hand of the children. Presumably they were looking for the tri-force of courage for Zant (and therefor for gannondorf)

llia's resemblance

to me llia has a striking resemblance to saria. but without the green colored hair. If many believe so, shouldn't we add that to her description so people can know who she is when they actually play the game. i could understand why we shouldn't add it though, so its ok if you feel we cant allow it. Haseo445 (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

No, that would be original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 18:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Link, Ganon, and Zelda

Shouldnt they each still get their pharagraph of info, and still have the link to the main article? --Blake (talk) 01:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Why? The information is already covered in the linked articles, so to repeat any such information here would be redundant. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 01:54, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Redirect?

I think a redirect may be necessary, since most or all of its content is a very in depth plot summary. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

It is saying their role in the game. Which is what the article is about. Each character's role. What else would you have there? Also, are you saying every character list should be merged? --Blake (talk) 20:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but it's ONLY saying their role in the game. What value is there to "this is the plot... FROM THEIR PERSPECTIVE"? And no, that's a silly suggestion, that I think every list should be merged. Many lists go the extra mile and provide real-world content, including Characters in Mother 3, which is a Japan-only release. Lucas' section is three paragraphs long, and only one of the paragraphs is plot-related. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I meant every Zelda Game's character list. lol. --Blake (talk) 20:51, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah. Well, if they can't provide real-world importance, and if they continue to be just "this is what this character does in this game", they should be. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:00, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, I don’t think that they should be merged, since they are the only place that has anything on the characters. There is a lot of good information about Midna and many other characters here. But, I also don’t think you should go around merging large articles without a consensus. Try putting up a AfD and see what people say about it. --Blake (talk) 21:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

A good bit of this is not just plot info. If we want to remove the plot centric paragraphs here, that would be fine, as long as we first ensure that that plot is actually represented in the main article for the game - otherwise, the information is not redundant, and there's little cause to remove it. However, there's more than enough character-centric info that would remain to justify keeping the article.

Hippie, as long as you make sure the removed info is actually redundant to the Twilight Princess article, I say go ahead and axe the plot info.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 21:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd agree on a merge/redirect. There's nothing here at the moment to show notability; the only sources cited are primary ones. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 19:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

As it stands, Midna's the only character I found anything worthwhile on. The best idea, I think, would be to merge all Zelda character lists into one, keeping only those that can have enough sources for them. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:00, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Split Midna out?

I believe this version of the Midna article, User:New Age Retro Hippie/Midna, should be its own article. It has both sections required to form its own article, and it's somewhat well-written. It may have been merged once, but I believe it was merged for lack of notability, not the character itself being unworthy of being separate. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 00:57, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Sure. I think we should be eventualy making a main List of characters in The Legend of Zelda series. Not only reoccuring characters, but the main notable characters for each game. It would include the Villains for each game, Link's family (his uncle, sister, grandma, etc), reoccurring characters, etc. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 01:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, I had that idea, but a little stricter; for example, Zant would only be included if he had reception and/or creation info. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 01:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I think the main characters should automatically be able to be on the list. Sure, Zant might not be notable, but thats why they dont have a real article. Its the "Minor characters" and "Reoccurring characters" that will need stricter rules. I mean if someone argues "Why isn't Valoo on the list?" they would understand "Because he was only a minor character in WW." But you cant make that argument about somebody like Zant. He was the main antagonist besides Ganon. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 01:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Still, I would prefer that we focus on characters with reception or creation. This is a bit stricter than if it were a single game list, as not every major character in the game should need reception/creation as long as most do. However, as a list that encompasses more than a dozen games, there will be disputes if we set in-universe reasonings for inclusion, with people arguing that Kafei warrants inclusion because he has the most notable sidequest in MM. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 02:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)