Protection? This is bad comedy. If you revert the page again, either another user or myself will report the incident to Admins board, and allow them to make an appropriate decision. I strongly suggest listening to the comments left on the TP article's talk page. If you do not understand them, do not change the article, as your edits will likely be seen as vandalism by the other editors. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  23:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kariteh (talk) 07:04, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

May 2008

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

3RR violation on List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. EdJohnston (talk) 13:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thetriforcehero (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not been vandalizing if you look at talk page you will notice that they are swearing like sailors because i dont belive in their fan beliefs also notice that they are going against fringe theroy, Im trying to end their edit war with something that suppots both sides

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for vandalism; you are blocked for breaking the three-revert rule, which your edit history shows you have done. Dispute Resolution has some advice for ways to resolve editing conflicts without edit-warring. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Further talk of unblock... May u show me where i revert edited? because the day i was blocked i only reverted once, I see severall edits but not edit reverts.....

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of characters in The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 22:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry case

edit
 

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Darkest-Link33 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  10:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply