This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
Hello! I'm moving Clara Schumann's compositions to this new page and will then expand out as many of these compositions to their own pages as I can. I have combined the current information on her biography page with the IMSLP information about her compositions. Once this page is fleshed out, I will update the current composition part of her biography to eliminate the doubling of information. As I'm new to Wikipedia, I sincerely hope I'm not running afoul of style guides or guidelines. Please point me in the right direction if I am! CherylFM (talk) 02:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
As an aside, the dates of publication for works with opus numbers are from the current Clara Schumann biography page, and the other works' dates are from IMSLP. Neither is adequately referenced, so that does need to be cleaned up.CherylFM (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As the page's introductory paragraph says: works with opus number are listed with publication date; those without opus get date of composition. This inconsistency appears to be simply the sources used by the first person to create this list (see talk page previous discussion above). I've noticed some contributors recently have "corrected" some of the opus number dates to a composition date, not realizing they're supposed to be that of publication. I undid those edits, but in my opinion all dates listed should be that of composition as that seems to be more useful information than first publication date. Opinions on this, anyone? If no one disagrees, I will change the dates of all compositions with opus numbers to composition date.
chuckstreet (talk) 00:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
