Talk:List of countries by population (United Nations)

Missing Source

The supposed 1 July 2016 population figures are incorrectly sourced. The citation is to a 2015 UN document, which only provides populations through 2015, and which was supposedly accessed on 1 June 2016 (one month before the professed date of the figures). Whoever posted these figures should provide the correct source. If not, then either someone should provide accurate, properly sourced figures, or the data should be removed. 2604:2000:EFC0:2:7C16:4E2E:E4E5:E5E8 (talk) 06:00, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

The source is the latest UN projection for 2016 published in the World Population Prospects, which is revised every other year, most recently in 2015. Cobblet (talk) 03:42, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

is this list even real? the figure for Indonesia is very very low compared to the well-established reality. or perhaps 50 million people died and i didnt hear about it? 49.189.137.49 (talk) 05:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Which countries have the highest population and most Skyscrapers and

I'd like a list of countries and more specifically cities that have the most skyscrapers , highest population and highest traffic density in that order. Quinton17 (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Conflicting claims

Does the China entry include Taiwan? Taiwan is listed separately, but the UN recognises only China (and presumably therefore its sovereignty over Formosa) --jftsang 20:47, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

It does not – in fact, it also does not include the population of Hong Kong or Macau which are also listed separately. Cobblet (talk) 21:24, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Formosa is not an accepted name. --92.75.193.121 (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Since when Mexico became part of Central America

You could say Mexico is a Lantin American country but Mexico is not in Central America. Central America is the small countries between north America and south America.

10 Mexico Americas Central America 127,540,423 129,163,276 +1.3%

@192.81.92.2: See page 16 of this UN document, quoted here as well. See also this explanation by the UN Statistics Division: "The major areas of Northern America and Latin America are distinguished, rather than the conventional continents of North America and South America, because population trends in the middle American mainland and the Caribbean region more closely resemble those of South America than those of America north of Mexico." See also the UNSD's explanation quoted on Quora: "You are correct, Mexico is in the continent called North America. In fact, there is no continent called Central America. However, we refer to Central America as a geographical region, not as a continent. There are seven continents. For statistical purposes, these seven continents were divided into over 20 "regions" that are so drawn as to obtain greater homogeneity in sizes of population, demographic circumstances and accuracy of demographic statistics." Cobblet (talk) 23:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Mexico is a tricky one, it is a part of North America but not a part of Northern America. Northern America only consists of Canada, Greenland and the United States. North America has two definitions, the major North America and the minor North America. The major North America includes Northern America, Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean, the minor North America only includes Northern America and Mexico. Central America generally only consists of the seven small countries south of Mexico, but the UN adds Mexico in to form a bigger Central America. This bigger Central America then combine with the Caribbean to form Middle America, Middle America and South America form Latin America, Latin America and Northern America form the mighty Americas, or simply America (not the United States of America). Confused? Try distinguish the difference between Oceania, Australasia and the continent of Australia (not the country of Australia). ;-p Xindeho (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Geography is so confusing, the International Geographical Union should really come up with some universally defined definitions, such as how many continents in the world, how many continental subregions in each continent and which countries belong to which continental subregion. Kenwick (talk) 04:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 25 December 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure)  samee  ^talk 08:30, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

---

List of countries by population (United Nations) → List of countries and dependencies by population (United Nations) – The current title of this article may cause ambiguity because countries by itself may mean only independent countries without dependencies or include them. The new title makes it clear what is being talked about. 2601:196:8901:A2D0:D4F:CEB7:6BAE:239 (talk) 19:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps, but most articles about such world rankings (see Template:Lists of countries by population statistics) don't use that formulation. The inclusion of "dependencies" does not remove all ambiguity – there are also disputed territories like Taiwan or Western Sahara to consider. WP:CONCISE is also a consideration. Cobblet (talk) 16:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Inclusion of dependent territories, politics and the suggested merger

Some entries listed here would likely cause political offense, such as the suggestion that Hong Kong be treated separately. There is also the question of why do these particular territories get privileges over other 'special regions' as they exist in a considerable number of countries.

Should 'dependent territories' really be included in a list of countries? You may say that the existence of different administrative privileges is the reason, but such arrangements exist everywhere, this list does not treat Scotland as its own country despite having its own parliament.I reason that it should not, since the job of Wikipedia should not be to state what countries or independence movements should, or should not be raised to the status of a country, but rather to report what is the case.

Palestine and Taiwan are special cases. Palestine as an observer state in the UN should keep its position, as should Taiwan due to the different administration from the Chinese mainland.

As for the suggested merger, I disagree with it on the grounds that this article deals specifically with population statistics based on projections by the United Nations. The other article could be used for a more subjective approach, or a merger could simply adjust the table to include the statistics side by side but that could get ugly quickly.

2A02:C7D:367B:E100:D253:49FF:FE99:A4E7 (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

The statistical entities listed here are exactly the ones the UN Statistics Division publishes statistics on. There is no picking and choosing here, nor should there be, if the whole purpose of this table is to present the UN data. If you want to "reason" about "what is the case", go to the other page. (By the way, even China's own Bureau of Statistics keeps statistics for Taiwan, HK and Macau separate from its figures for mainland China, so I'm not sure what you're talking about when you mention offending people.) Cobblet (talk) 18:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Switched Palestine to null rank like Taiwan already was at the time of this comment based on them not being recognized as members of the United Nations (most recent UN resolution on the matter). I personally believe they are a de facto state and hope they are given a UN vote soon, but if we rank Palestine, there become compelling cases for ranking other partially recognized entities like Kosovo and Western Sahara (as Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic) that could get pretty contentious LbPirate (talk) 23:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Idk why this is here as a "response" to a 2018 comment but anyway reverted to longstanding version, Palestine is ranked as a UN observer state, the other examples are therefore not comparable. Selfstudier (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

I see the confusion now, the sources listed in the article do not consider places like Hong Kong countries but rather areas or regions. My objection is that the term countries is quite politically loaded, I'll give you an example.

This article: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/12/marriott-apologises-to-china-over-tibet-and-taiwan-error demonstrates what I am trying to get at.

2A02:C7D:367B:E100:2D2D:A285:978:F6ED (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Minor error in country rank

Picador998 (talk) 03:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)The ranking for Colombia (28) and Kenya (29) should be reversed, based on the 2017 population figures of Kenya (49,699,862) and Colombia (49,065,615); presuming those figures are correct.

The list reports statistics published by the UN in the documents cited in the article, which themselves are based on but generally do not coincide with statistics published by national statistical offices. Cobblet (talk) 19:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Eritrea

Eritrea, a UN member state, is not included. Nu11us (talk) 21:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC).

It was removed during recent vandalism – thanks for noticing. I have reverted back to the last correct version. Cobblet (talk) 01:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Russia's population

It seems as if Russia's population is listed as including Crimea's population in the 2016 column but in the 2017 column Crimea's population is not included. Shouldn't both columns be consistent? I suggest including Crimea's population for both columns or excluding it from both. Lanson15 (talk) 03:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Markup

Sorry, Cobblet, I left the wrong version on; I've now reverted a working one. All I did was add transclusion markup so these figures can be used across WP, instead of having the plethora of outdated and unchecked population figures being quoted all throughout WP. Guarapiranga (talk) 20:03, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

That's a great idea, and thanks for the explanation. Cobblet (talk) 22:07, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

No worries, Cobblet. Now working at: List of South American countries by population. Guarapiranga (talk) 23:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Alignment problem

@Guarapiranga: If you run desktop view on an iPhone or an iPad, the ranking column does not line up correctly with the country entries. I have no idea how to fix this, so I hope you can. --T*U (talk) 08:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Correction: By a closer look, it seems to be OK on the iPad, so it is only on the iPhone (in desktop view) that the problem shows up. --T*U (talk) 11:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

@TU-nor: It looks OK to me in Safari in desktop view in my iphone using the latest version of iOS. What browser are you using, and what version of iOS?

If you are using an older version of iOS, then that means you are using an older version of Safari. Maybe try another browser. Some browsers use their latest versions even on old versions of iOS. -- Timeshifter (talk) 02:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

@Timeshifter: I use Safari with iOS 12.4.3, which is the newest on an iPhone 6, but my concern has nothing to do with what kind of platform I use and how I can get it correct on my screen. My point is that ordinary Wikipedia users should get the correct table, independent of what platform they use. The formatting used must not be platform dependent. --T*U (talk) 08:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

@TU-nor: On my old iphone 5c the only up to date browser that will install on it is the MS Edge browser. And it has the same problem in desktop view that you are having. I see now that it is less of a browser problem, and more of a text size problem. The text is so small that the rows narrow enough to be effected by the flag icon sizes. So the rows no longer align with each other since flags are only in the right table and not the left table of row numbers. You can see the same thing on a PC monitor if you lessen text alone enough. The solution is for the developers to get back to work on this. They had a patch, but then abandoned working on it for reasons I do not understand. See phab:T42618: "jquery.tablesorter: Add support for a 'fixed' column of row numbers." -- Timeshifter (talk) 08:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

@Timeshifter: Thanks for the explanation. Could you please give a word to the developers about this, since you seem to have the technical insight to explain it properly? (I find that developers often have problems seeing things with the eyes of users with less technical competence...) --T*U (talk) 09:06, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

@TU-nor: I couldn't agree more: "I find that developers often have problems seeing things with the eyes of users with less technical competence." Many developers are so deep in the weeds that they can't even understand what the average reader is seeing. And I think they are tired of hearing it from me. :) I suggest you leave a comment at phab:T42618: -- Timeshifter (talk) 09:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

So the problem is with using desktop view on a mobile device? No wonder, TU-nor. Guarapiranga (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

I´m afraid I do not quite understand your comment, Guarapiranga. Why shouldn't desktop view work correctly on a mobile device. --T*U (talk) 06:32, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Using the desktop view on Windows with Firefox, I see a very slight misalignment by a few pixels. This is due to different flag image sizes, e.g. Nepal and Switzerland being >15px. Remove the lines or edit the image height using Inspect element and the alignment is good. However, if I zoom in there is a larger misalignment. Now the usual 15px flag image height is too large.

Bizarrely the mobile view for me aligns (regardless of zoom level). When I use Inspect Element it shows the mobile view gets different code for the image.

Desktop view:

<span class="flagicon">
    <img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Flag_of_Nepal.svg/16px-Flag_of_Nepal.svg.png" decoding="async" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Flag_of_Nepal.svg/25px-Flag_of_Nepal.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Flag_of_Nepal.svg/33px-Flag_of_Nepal.svg.png 2x" data-file-width="726" data-file-height="885" width="16" height="20">
       
    </span>

Mobile view:

<span class="flagicon">
     <noscript>
         <img alt="" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Flag_of_Nepal.svg/16px-Flag_of_Nepal.svg.png" decoding="async" width="16" height="20" data-file-width="726" data-file-height="885"  
     </noscript>
     <img class="image-lazy-loaded" alt="" style="width: 16px; height: 20px;" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Flag_of_Nepal.svg/16px-Flag_of_Nepal.svg.png" srcset="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Flag_of_Nepal.svg/25px-Flag_of_Nepal.svg.png 1.5x, //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Flag_of_Nepal.svg/33px-Flag_of_Nepal.svg.png 2x" width="16" height="20">
        
</span>

Not sure what's going on there, but class="image-lazy-loaded" stands out. However, the explanation may also involve the line-height, which is set to 1.5em in desktop view and left unset in mobile view, where the rows seem taller relative to the flag image size. Different browsers settings and wikipedia view seem to give different rendering of the image sizes and line heights, which seems to be the cause of the problem.   Jts1882 | talk  14:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

A workable solution is to put the flagicon in a div element of fixed height (so it doesn't change cell height) and allow the overflow to be visible. I have implemented this solution in a module that Guarapiranga and I have been working on. An example is at User:Jts1882/blank where there is a long table with many Nepal entries. The alignment is good for me on desktop and mobile view, but I have no Apple devices.

How to implement this with {{rank}} is less clear. A wrapper for {{flagcountry}} to add the div element is one possibility, although ideally someone could change {{flagcountry}} itself so that the height could be set. It does take a size parameter that changes the image width. I've modified this to change the height of the Nepal, Switzerland and Vatican flags to 15px height, which works better except when screen window zoomed in (very small text).   Jts1882 | talk  15:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, tried that with an inline table on {{flag+link}}, but couldn't get it right for all cases, Jts1882. If you manage that in {{flagcountry}}, I can copy it over to other flag templates.

The other reason I wanted to use a table instead of a div was to stop the country name from wrapping under the flag (e.g. here). Guarapiranga (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, that was badly stated by me. I didn't modify {{flagcountry}}. I modified the list of populations on this page to explicitly change size on the three flags with heights greater than 15px (e.g. Nepal. Shame the flag templates only have a size parameter handling width. Height would be useful.   Jts1882 | talk  07:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

About iphone browser views: User:Jts1882/blank allows the desktop view of table text to be viewed without row alignment problems in Safari on my old iphone 5c. Compared to the row alignment problem when viewing List of countries by population (United Nations).

In desktop view on Safari on my iphone X I have no row alignment problems of either page in desktop view. Iphones with the latest iOS also get the latest version of Safari.

On my PC in Firefox I only notice row alignment problems once I get to around 80% of normal text size: Firefox > View menu > zoom text only > zoom out. That's true for the tables on either page. -- Timeshifter (talk) 07:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Similarly on my laptop with Fixfox. I get misaligment at 67% and below for the List of countries by population (United Nations), but my 450 row table with multiple Nepals etc shows no misalignment, even at 30%. I was hoping that I'd found the solution. Am I right to guess that you have a high resolution monitor on your PC (mine is a laptop with generic 1600x900)?

I've written a module function to emulate the {{Static column begin}} and {{Static column row}} templates. You can use it with the {{rank/sandbox}} template. This seems to behave the same as the templates on the UN population list. I think the Lua code will make trouble-shooting this problem easier, assuming there is a universal solution.   Jts1882 | talk  12:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

@Jts1882: I hadn't noticed that you had added the table from List of countries by population (United Nations) to the bottom of User:Jts1882/blank.

In Firefox on my 27 inch PC monitor I have to get below 67% of normal text size before I notice any row misalignment on your table with multiple Nepals. With ctrl/mouse-wheel I can go down by 10% per mouse wheel click. So going down by 10s from 100 I notice no problem until I hit 60%.

I see very slight row misalignment beginning at 80% of normal text size on the table from List of countries by population (United Nations)

The above is true whether I am at 1920x1080 or 2560x1440.

More and more, I am thinking that we should get rid of flags in tables. They serve no useful educational purpose. Only a nationalistic purpose. We have too much nationalism on Wikipedia messing things up. :) -- Timeshifter (talk) 07:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

I think the alignment problem may not be solvable. It seems that what you see at higher resolutions is different to my low resolution. The flags are images set with pixels, whereas most scaling will be handled using more flexible units (e.g. ems). Getting something that works with all browsers, screen sizes and zooms may not be possible.

I did try using an image in the rank cells to fix the height in the same way, but this only works if all the flag images are the same height. Many are less than 15px and this caused problems. Fixing the height of all flags to 15px in the main table causes text alignment problems and looked terrible.

One approach that might work is for the line height to be set for all rows in both tables. I think this can be done using CSS styling, which would also allow options for screen size and mobile view.

I do have a concern about whether the static rank table should used at all. It may violate WP:ACCESS. A screen reader will read the contents of the rank table (left cell of the outer table) before reading the data table (right cell of outer table). The result will be that the ranks aren't associated with the corresponding data rows and are meaninless.   Jts1882 | talk  08:46, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

A row-number table is another separate table. How does a screen reader read side-by-side tables? There are side-by-side tables in various Wikipedia articles. I don't see how it would effect a screen reader negatively all that much, if at all.

I am not sure the separate table would be associated with the other table. So I assume someone hearing a screen reader read a list of numbers would ignore it, since the numbers are not connected to anything by the screen reader. No great loss. Many tables do not have row numbers or rank columns. But I don't know anything about screen readers.

An integrated row-number column would be a lot better. Do you have any idea what is happening with phab:T42618? By the way, I had forgotten the "T" before 42618 in some of the previous links.

Setting line height in both tables might work. Is there an easy way to do that? The line height would have to be set larger than normal line height. In order to deal with flag icons and smaller text in cell phones. -- Timeshifter (talk) 09:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

I've added templatestyles to my module version and used rows to set the row heights of the both tables. It works for me with 2.5em or 30px (currently set). See the copy of the UN population list on my test page (User:Jts1882/blank) (the yellow background is just to help me with CSS selectors and show its being used). It uses a class in the outer table to set the row height of both tables (see Template:Static column begin/styles.css), which you can test by changing the CSS style. You can use it at any table using {{rank/sandbox}}. Where is that table with the super and subscripts? That might need a larger row height.   Jts1882 | talk  09:55, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

(unindent). List of countries by life expectancy has a "combined table" that has super and subscripts.

With Safari in both iphone 5c and X I can look at all tables on User:Jts1882/blank without misalignment. In both mobile view and desktop view.

In Firefox in my 27 inch monitor I see misalignment when I hit 60% on the non-yellow tables. On the yellow table I see misalignment when I hit 50%. All of this is the same at 1920x1080 or 2560x1440. -- Timeshifter (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

I've added an option to handle |row-height=large which sets a larger line-height using the CSS. I've modified List of countries by life expectancy to get a result that aligns for me (but commented it out). You can experiment with the numbers in Template:Static column begin/styles.css. Perhaps ems would work better than px across different screen sizes.   Jts1882 | talk  11:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

a lot of this data is messed up & wrong

that's really all I wanted to say. skakEL 12:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

New updated population?

seems like there is no July 1st, 2020. Maybe someone can get rid of the 2018 section and make the 2020 population database. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YoutubeFrezzy (talk • contribs) 20:33, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Western Samoa?

Why is it labelled as Western Samoa? That country is now just called Samoa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miripog (talk • contribs) 04:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

{{rank}}

i removed {{rank}} because the cells were not matching the rows in the table. there needs to be some sort of [formatting] change before you put it back.Catchpoke (talk) 01:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

You're going to have to be more specific. I don't see any problems on my end. What device are you using to view the page? Maybe refer to the discussion above (Talk:List of countries by population (United Nations)#Alignment problem) to see if it's similar to what others have described, but it seemed that the issues had been fixed. Cobblet (talk) 01:28, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

United Kingdom alphabetization

When you sort by alphabetical order the United Kingdom is listed under G, like Great Britain. Not sure how to fix this but someone may want to make it sort to U.

 Fixed. — 𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚 (talk) 00:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Notes section has errors, red text, and very large font size

Guarapiranga. See diff of your edits. The notes section you created with those edits has many problems. --Timeshifter (talk) 22:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

 Fixed. — 𝐆𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐚 (talk) 00:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

The UN has released the World Population Prospects 2022

The UN has released the World Population Prospects 2022, please update the data from the now outdated World Population Prospects 2019. RayAdvait (talk) 07:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of countries and dependencies by population which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:03, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Update in progress

I am updating the data in this article manually.

Data of countries with more than 5 million people (as of 2022) are completed by UTC 23:20, Feb 9th 2023.

It'll take me another 2-3 days to get the job done (if nobody else joins me). XiaYZ2023 (talk) 23:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Job Done. XiaYZ2023 (talk) 15:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Additional notes on my update to the 2022 UN WPP

1. Now every item on this list is consistent with the original UN list (see reference). Changes include that the two consitituent part of the Channel Islands are now listed seperately; Kosovo and Serbia are shown seperately, etc.

2. The Holy See is not listed in the original list.

3. Only UN member states and UN observer states have a ranking now. XiaYZ2023 (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

At node limit

I'd like to add a note that UK data excludes Channel Islands, Man, Gibraltar, and everything outside Europe, but that exceeds Wikipedia's node limit and goofs up formatting in much the same way as Guarapiranga noticed in 2021.

Any ideas on how to reduce the number of nodes? Perhaps there are places where country names don't need hyperlinks? LbPirate (talk) 04:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

How about grouping some of the footnotes. For instance one footnote could cover Taiwan, Macau and Hong Kong.

Use of {{lst}} is expensive as its getting the values from the page recursively using #lst. Putting the numbers in the {{change}} template should reduce resource use, although the numbers have to be entered twice, e.g. {{change|145,112,000|146,234,777|disp=out}} --> +0.77%.

I've looked at trying to solve the need to enter the number twice with a module function, which would return the wikitxt for the year0, year1 and change cells, but I can't work out how to return section tags (they don't behave like other tags such as ref). It may be impossible due to T39256. —  Jts1882 | talk  06:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

{{subst:lst}} reduced the node count to 998,199 / 1,000,000 – just barely inside the limit (DIFF). – wbm1058 (talk) 01:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Vatican City

Hello there! I am the creator of this article from 2013. I am attempting to re-add Vatican City to the list, as it seems to have been accidentally removed. However, I might be making a mistake as it is causing issues with the formatting. Could someone assist me? Here is the code I am trying to add:

|-
| style=text-align:left | {{flagcountry|VAT}}<ref group=lower-alpha>Listed as ''[[Holy See]]''.</ref> || style=text-align:center | [[Europe]] || style=text-align:center | [[Southern Europe]] || <section begin=VAT_0/>510<section end=VAT_0/> || <section begin=VAT_1/>518<section end=VAT_1/> || {{change|{{lst|VAT_0}}|{{lst|VAT_1}}|disp=out}}

I would greatly appreciate any assistance. Thank you! Pristino (talk) 12:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

This 10 February 2023 edit removed VAT; it seems to have been intentional per #Additional notes on my update to the 2022 UN WPP. – wbm1058 (talk) 02:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Country Rankings

The country rankings start with India at number 2 with rank number 1 occupying a cell which should remain empty. Someone please fix this. 98.150.137.168 (talk) 00:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Column order

Don't anyone do a lot of work per this suggestion - this is for the odd wizard who is able to re-make this list via a script.

But anyways, the column order should be reconsidered, as an awful lot of people visit WP on a small-screen device nowadays. Here's one possible reordering:

• (rank, automatic)
• Location
• Population (year of most recent July)
• Change
• Population (one year ago) - an optional column, really
• Region
• Subregion

Wizmut (talk) 23:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Wizmut. Moving columns around is explained here:

Help:Creating tables#Move/delete row/column

--Timeshifter (talk) 12:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

@Wizmut: I moved the population columns to the left. This is better for cell phones. Took about one minute. Does not take a wizard. Try it sometime on another table. I updated: Help:Creating tables#Move/delete row/column. --Timeshifter (talk) 22:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Good to know - I don't usually check what the visual editor can do but that's a very convenient feature. Cheers Wizmut (talk) 23:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

The UK is Not a Country

The United Kingdom is not a country. It is a group of countries that contain Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales. The full title is "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". Great Britain is not a country either. Great Britain is made up of Scotland, England and Wales. You should have seperate statistics for each of these four countries (Scotland, England, Northern Ireland and Wales) and not combine them. 2A00:23C6:C0A2:1501:914:F645:97F3:604F (talk) 22:28, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Need exact directions to sources for July 1, 2022 and July 1, 2023 columns

I added {{fact}} to the 2023 and 2022 column headers. Need exact directions to sources for July 1, 2022 and July 1, 2023 columns. The references are poorly done and don't meet WP:V. --Timeshifter (talk) 20:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

I did the best I could. A direct link to a pre-built table might not work because the tool likes to break if you ask for too much information. Wizmut (talk) 05:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Direct links are not usually a good idea. Data sites change, and such links can break. Better to explain exactly how to get to a data table online, and a quality download link if possible. The more detail the better. No missing steps if possible. It allows other editors to try their hand at updating and creating tables. We need the help!

Why do you believe the date is July 1 for each year? That needs to be removed if it can't be verified. --Timeshifter (talk) 08:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

I added a citation for the methodology. Wizmut (talk) 09:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Mexico, here, listed as a central American country. when in fact it's a north American country

Mexico, here, listed as a central American country. when in fact it's a north American country 173.44.116.98 (talk) 17:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Proper "change" value for micronations?

The row for Pitcairn Islands currently has a manually entered change value that does not match the rest of the table (no color highlighting, too many decimals, not sortable). I was about to commit my edit, adjusting the Pitcairn row to match the other rows, but the preview showed that the result would be `-18.18%`, a value much larger than any other row in the table. The different treatment for Pitcairn could be intentional. Personally, I think the same rules should apply here, even if a country's tiny population makes the y-o-y changes look huge, but I'm not a expert editor and I don't want to step on anyone's toes.

Same thing applies to the Vatican, which currently shows "N/A" as the "change" value. We have the 2022 and 2023 population values, but the calculated difference from 55 to 45 would be significant.

Should I adjust the table to treat Pitcairn and Vatican like the other countries? If not, please explain the reason, for the archives. Scratchy (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

More recent data available (WPP 2024)

The UN has now released their 2024 revision of World Population Prospects. The table uses data from the 2022 revision. Perhaps it is time to update the data for 2024 instead of the table showing the 2022 population PROJECTIONS for 2024? More recent data is now available, after all. Hsifnwolc (talk) 19:47, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

I updated the table 12 hours ago. The document only includes 2024 in the projections tab, so I updated the 2022 and 2023 figures. | Petnog (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Errors

Germany and Japan have had their populations swapped in the population table. 149.50.169.94 (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, also the Netherlands and North Korea - I've had to switch them back round twice 82.44.234.222 (talk) 11:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)