Talk:List of countries by real GDP per capita growth

Latest comment: 2 months ago by HudecEmil in topic Move proposal

This article does not state over which time period. Also the statement "This shows for instance that the average increase in standard of living of the US lies below the EU average" sounds like POV-pushing to me and is therefore problematic. -- Cabalamat 22:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wow, no source, no time period. I removed the POV language, but given how high this page pops up in a Google search it really should be sourced! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.65.71.174 (talk) 14:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


This page is useless

edit

It seems to document the growth for just the year of 2007. This is not a useful number for cross-border comparisons, because growth fluctuates strongly according to economic cycles, and each country is on a different part of the cycle.

A ten year period would be far better. I've tried to find data but with no success. Does anyone know a source?

Would it be considered original research if we used two different sources and divided the numbers by each other?

Cambrasa 23:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Duplicate Page

edit

According to the source, The CIA's World Factbook, this is a table of GDP - real growth rate (%) but not adjusted for population growth. This is a poor duplicate of List of countries by GDP (real) growth rate and should be merged with it.

Id447 (talk) 21:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's not now a duplicate. Spacepotato (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Then what the heck is it? Sbw01f (talk) 04:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


It's a list of countries by the growth rate of GDP per capita, i.e., the growth rate of P/N, where P is the GDP and N is the population. By the way, your speedy deletion tag on this page was inappropriate, as being a duplicate is not a criterion for speedy deletion. Spacepotato (talk) 08:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


South Africa

On looking at the article: South Africa, it's GDP per capita hasnt increased since the fall of apartheid and this year it went down by $3,000!, should it be put in negative numbers? --Bezuidenhout (talk) 12:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

New Discussion

edit

A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries. Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 11:31, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of countries by GDP (real) per capita growth rate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Not Real GDP

edit

Hi. This is Nominal GDP, not Real GDP. --95.24.70.126 (talk) 16:28, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Move proposal

edit

Proposing renaming to "List of countries by real GDP per capita growth", to be shorter and more readable. HudecEmil (talk) 19:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

No disagreement, proceeding with move HudecEmil (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply