Talk:List of dinosaurs and other Mesozoic reptiles of New Zealand

Lists List‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there a reference for the "probably an allosaur like Megalosaurus" statement? Because Megalosaurus isn't an allosauroid, so it's hard to interpret it. Suffice to say it's probably a tetanuran? 98.231.21.195 (talk) 17:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

New Zealand Ichthyosaur

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Should more info be given about the ichthyosaur in the notes, i mean we should have at least a bit of info on what is likely the largest animal to have existed (if using Shastasaurus proportions.) Kentrostego32 (talk) 21:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Um, what? To date, no paleontologist has stated any Ancient Marine Reptile is bigger than the Blue Whale (or Fin Whale, for that matter.)50.111.41.216 (talk) 01:04, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hector's ichthyosaur fossils being lost.

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should the section on them being lost be removed? People know where they are now, per the linked video in its section, and the myth that they went missing in the Matoaka disappearance is used in the cited source for it being lost. The Matoaka went missing in 1869, with the first specimen of the ichthyosaur being discovered in 1871 and the infamous giant one in 1877. So it's impossible for the fossils to have been lost with the Matoaka. Ashe VSM (talk) 15:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Expert review of the tables needed

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I found this article by WP:RANPP and decided to fix up the table with some references. I added citations for most of what I could find, but based on the material I skimmed it looks like there would be many more candidates to fill the table. I'm not sure what the significance of these entries is compared to all other options -- I would flag this for expert review. For reference, in addition to the citations I've added to the main article, I think doi:10.1080/14772011003594870 (PDF) is a useful source because it lists and reclassifies a variety of fossils. Namnatulco (talk) 16:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic