Talk:List of directors of the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ahnoneemoos in topic Requested merge
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Requested merge
editUser:Qwyrxian beleives that this article should be merged into Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. I beleive that it's better if we have a clean and concise list on the main article with a separated and detailed list on this article. The Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration is similar to a foreign affairs ministry and it's important to detail its Directors, but not on its main article. The main article already has a clean and concise list of its former Directors while this article has a detailed view. This is accepted on Wikipedia and is not a violation of any rules. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, that is not at all what I believe. I believe that this article should never have been split in the first place. Is there a difference? Yes, because in the split, the burden is on you to gain consensus for the new article; in merge, it would be on me to gain consensus to put it into the other article. In other words, the default change. Since this was a split, the default must be to remain with the original article (i.e., separating out the list). Qwyrxian (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- That's not how WP:BEBOLD and WP:SPLIT works bro. Sorry. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 17:49, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, that is not at all what I believe. I believe that this article should never have been split in the first place. Is there a difference? Yes, because in the split, the burden is on you to gain consensus for the new article; in merge, it would be on me to gain consensus to put it into the other article. In other words, the default change. Since this was a split, the default must be to remain with the original article (i.e., separating out the list). Qwyrxian (talk) 01:33, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Wikipedia is not paper. Lists of office holders with bells and whistles is a common practice; heck, a huge category is for them. - Altenmann >t 12:19, 26 November 2012 (UTC)