Talk:List of districts of Lima

Untitled

On a lot of articles about districts of Lima it states that Chilean invaders sacked and burned this district or that one. I am not dening that this is true but it does not need to be put on there because there are many other things that Lima has and they don't have to be constantly reminded about the war because it was over a hundred years ago. You don't see battles of the Mexican-American War being described in articles about cities of Mexico.

I don't think you've read a lot of articles about Mexican places. Besides, the War of the Pacific is an important part of Peruvian history and not mentioning it would be absurd. --StarbucksFreak 03:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

data for districts from INEI

(District / 2002 poopulation / Area (km2))

• Lima 345898 21.98
• San Miguel 132504 10.72
• Magdalena del Mar 52976 3.61
• San Isidro 68438 11.10
• Surquillo 99144 3.46
• Miraflores 92815 9.62
• Barranco 45922 3.33
• Santiago de Surco 251648 34.75
• La Molina 137327 65.75
• San Borja 128618 9.96
• San Luis 59213 3.49
• La Victoria 228345 8.74
• Lince 70968 3.03
• Jesus Maria 67187 4.57
• Magdalena Vieja 80384 4.38
• Breña 94808 3.22
• Rimac 211679 11.87
• San Martin de Porres 459139 36.91
• Los Olivos 301226 18.25
• Independencia 206843 14.56
• Comas 496100 48.75
• Puente Piedra 168073 71.18
• San Juan de Lurigancho 755540 131.25
• El Agustino 166177 12.54
• Santa Anita 154359 10.69
• Chorrillos 270081 38.94
• San Juan de Miraflores 367128 23.98
• Villa El Salvador 330143 35.46
• Villa Maria del Triunfo 329057 70.57
• Ate 350918 77.72

• Pachacamac 33392 160.23
• Lurin 49436 181.12
• Punta Hermosa 5139 119.50
• Punta Negra 4206 130.5
• San Bartolo 3527 45.01
• Santa Maria del Mar 264 9.81
• Pucusana 4527 37.83
• Ancon 30725 299.22
• Santa Rosa 5896 21.50
• Carabayllo 148634 346.88
• Lurigancho 125088 236.47
• Cieneguilla 13437 240.33
• Chaclacayo 41055 39.50

Image copyright problem with Image:Los Olivos COA.png

The image Image:Los Olivos COA.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• Image:San Borja coat of arms.png

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of districts of Lima. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080423164200/http://desa.inei.gob.pe/mapas/bid/ to http://desa.inei.gob.pe/mapas/bid/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)