Talk:List of ecologists
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of ecologists article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Redundant page?
editWith the category system this page is redundant. With the category system it is autometically updated as new ecologists are added and they can be categoised into sub-cats. This page requires manual updating and does not have a suitable country classification system. Alan Liefting 03:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think this page has value independent of the category pages, and it seems no one has recommended it for deletion in the 4+ years since the above comment. At present, this page and the category pages (Ecologists and American ecologists, for example) seem to have relatively little overlap. Also, this page seems more historical, while the others seem more concerned with living or at least recent ecologists. I think this page should be kept, at least until all ecologists on this list are categorized appropriately so they do appear on the other list(s). I'm working on that, albeit slowly. --Araucana (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Per editing guidelines, no, the page isn't redundant to categories. See WP:NOTDUP, where it states, in part, "It is neither improper nor uncommon to simultaneously have a category, a list, and a navigation template which all cover the same topic. These redundant systems of organizing information are considered to be complementary, not inappropriately duplicative."... Northamerica1000(talk) 00:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Find sources
editExternal links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of ecologists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100911052321/http://richarddawkins.net/articles/514884-george-c-williams-1926-2010 to http://richarddawkins.net/articles/514884-george-c-williams-1926-2010
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)