Talk:List of equipment of the Irish Army


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Modern weapons of the Irish Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge?

edit
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Hi. A "merge" tag was recently added to this and the Modern vehicles of the Irish Army article. But no discussion was opened on either talk page. Per convention, "after adding the merge template, [the proposing editor] is expected to create a section on the talk page of the appropriate article [..] explaining [the] rationale for the merge proposal". Eurohunter, you seem to have forgotten to complete this part. Can you advise please what rationale is offered for the proposal? (FYI - If the rationale is for consistency with the likes of similar articles/lists (like List of modern equipment of the German Army), then I'd be minded to support the merge myself. But other editors might appreciate the opportunity to understand/discuss/contribute....) Guliolopez (talk) 00:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Guliolopez: Thanks for reminder. Yes consistency is valid reason for merge proposal. Eurohunter (talk) 10:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Bump. This has been tagged now for ~1 month. Unless there are other thoughts, I will go ahead shortly with the merge. Guliolopez (talk) 03:06, 2 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  Resolved As it has been a month or more since the tag was added (and a week or more since this discussion was bumped), and as no other thoughts were forthcoming, I've gone ahead with the merge. The article title and content is now (largely) aligned with the equivalents. Like: Modern equipment of the French Army, Modern equipment of the Bulgarian land forces, Modern equipment of the Brazilian Army, etc. Closing thread. Guliolopez (talk) 17:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Scorpion?

edit
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

To my understanding the FV101 Scorpion is no longer in active service. Apart from the odd Tweet or similar non-RS source, the only source that I have found in relation to this change is this piece on tanks-encyclopedia.com - which suggests a retirement date in 2017. Certainly, since then, the Scorpion is conspicuous by absence in reports/whitepapers/written answers from the department. But "lack of evidence" is not really "evidence". Also, the appearance of several examples in "static display" scenarios also doesn't really meet RS. I am, however, tempted to remove from here. But, if anyone has a more concrete source before doing so, that might be best. (Anyone perhaps with sub to An Cosantóir or similar? Am sure they covered retirement...) Guliolopez (talk) 00:27, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bump. Unless there are other thoughts, I will likely go ahead and remove/update the notes on the Scorpion. Primarily using this piece on tanks-encyclopedia.com as the basis/source. Guliolopez (talk) 03:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Resolved Not having heard any other opinions in several weeks/months, I have gone ahead with the change. Guliolopez (talk) 00:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 25 July 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 00:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


List of modern equipment of the Irish ArmyList of equipment of the Irish Army – The word "modern" is redundant, except if there is another article titled "List of antique equipment of the Irish Army", which there isn't. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply