Talk:List of extinct animals of the Philippines

This redirect is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

Extinction Low‑importance

	This redirect is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this redirect, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Stegodon cf. trigonocephalus

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have seen many sources citing S. trigonocephalus. Many of which has a cf., indication of not having an indicative characteristic that may attribute it to the named species but is still more likely to be attributed into them. There were also sources like (Allen, 1991) citing that the presence of S. trigonocephalus is definite in Luzon but not in Mindanao.

See Allen, H. (1991). Stegodonts and the dating of stone tool assemblages in island Southeast Asia. Asian Perspectives, 30(2), 243-265. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artemesiagentile (talk • contribs) 09:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stegodon cf. sinensis inclusion

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have seen several papers mentioning Stegodon sinensis on them. However, I usually gather few information about them, and in many instances they were not even mentioned in papers at all. Unlike, S. trigonocephalus which has mentions across the country. I may add them if I gathered more information about the fossil discovery. I also have no idea whether this species were dwarfed or not.

In addition, I also found a paper documenting the probable diet of Philippine proboscideans, but it has no mentions on what speculated species were the dwarf stegodon. It is however, provided with the information being it is a Luzon specimen and that it is different from a S. luzonensis (evident from a strict C4 diet of S. luzonensis). I can't say for certain whether they are from the S. sinensis lineage, and I only saw it being mentioned solely on that paper. Artemesiagentile (talk) 20:25, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic