Per WP:CSC, entries should have a stand-alone article or at the very least have an independent reliable source with some coverage to verify both the entry's inclusion criteria and its alleged notability (depending on page-specific editor consensus). Lists should not contain indiscriminate unsourced information or be misused to promote non-notable businesses and other COI edits. Whether one agrees with keeping such lists or not, several "keep" votes in the previous AfD discussion also emphasized the need to focus on notable entries. Previously-deleted unencyclopedic and unsourced listcruft should not be simply re-inserted - all entries must verifiably meet basic list inclusion criteria. GermanJoe (talk) 08:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
