Talk:List of giant squid specimens and sightings/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about List of giant squid specimens and sightings. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Work in progress

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please be aware that this list is not comprehensive just yet. It is only "complete" up to 1996; after that, only the most important reports are included. I'll try to finish it off with some additional sources soon. Mgiganteus1 09:21, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Image gallery problem

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Very bad accessibility to many users. To get a truncated line of information in a small font, you must hover the cursor over each image. Why not make a Gallery so people can read more than the first 84 characters of each description in a human-readable size, with all descriptions visible at once without extra effort? Wikipeditor 01:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

TONMO.com references this list

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi -- just a note to say that TONMO.com defers to this list as the definitive resource on Giant Squid strandings. Related link here: http://www.tonmo.com/science/public/squidlist.php Tonmo 13:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Attention page authors: info

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can the authors of this page incorporate the following info from Dr. Steve O'Shea, as found on TONMO.com? (see first reply) - http://www.tonmo.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10974 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonmo (talk • contribs) 17:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Giantsquidphoto2.png

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image Image:Giantsquidphoto2.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

2009 Saltspring Island record

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Just a note. I was able to examine more photographs of this squid after the PQB News article was published. One photo showed a tentacle club that had hooks rather than suckers and another was at the appropriate angle to show that the mantle was textured with raised longitudinal ridges. The squid was actually a robust clubhook squid, Moroteuthis robustus, NOT an Architeuthis. Apologies for the misunderstanding.

Graham Gillespie

--198.103.39.129 (talk) 17:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. Has this reidentification been published/posted somewhere else? To comply with Wikipedia's policies on no original research and verifiability we'd need a reference for this information. mgiganteus1 (talk) 19:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Two more sightings to add to list

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I will leave it up to the creators/maintainers of this article to work in the details given the formatting here which I do not want to screw up. Here are 2 more sightings of giant squid. The first, see [1], occured in September 2009 in the Gulf of Mexico, and I am 99% certain this is Architeuthis. The sizes and general characteristics seem reasonably close from the article and pics. The second, see [2] is a much shorter article about a very recent large, live, actual school of what the article is calling "giant squid" though it is unclear if this is meant actual Architeuthis or if it just means "fairly large squid of another genus". The article reports them being caught "by the hundreds" and the one picture shows a fairly large (1-1.5 meter) mantle and is reporting weights of 20-40 pounds, with occasional specimens up to 60 pounds. This article was quite short, but it may be a good lead. --Jayron32 16:11, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the links! I'm glad there's someone else out there who likes lists of giant squid. :) The second source concerns Humboldt squid, which are sometimes called "giant squid" as well. The first ref, however, is indeed about Architeuthis; this specimen is listed here under "30 July 2009", the date of its capture. I have added this link as a second ref since it provides some additional information and images. Cheers, mgiganteus1 (talk) 00:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Spelling of placenames in Norway

Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

There have been significant changes over the years to how placenames in Norway are spelled. E.g. Kirkeseterøren -> Kyksæterøra, Senjen -> Senja. This list seems to mostly use the spellings in the original papers, even when they are now archaic. This obviously makes it easier to find the sightings in the papers, but harder to find the locations on a map. What's Wikipedia policy about this? Jon kare (talk) 07:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

In general, spelling of any word in Wikipedia should be influenced by the audience that will read it. The scientific community in the English Wikipedia will typically use American or British English, so either of those variations would be preferred. If there are multiple English spellings of a place name, use the most common one. Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

It's not a question of English vs Norwegian spellings. It's whether or not to modernize Norwegian spellings. Jon kare (talk) 17:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps the best option, then, is to use the same spelling that is used in other parts of Wikipedia. If it's not there, take the liberty to choose one and be consistent when using that name. Bob the Wikipedian ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

When I created this list I tried to retain the original spellings and names of both locations and anatomical features (e.g. jaws vs. beak) so that the list would agree with the source literature (and to avoid potential OR and mistakes of interpretation). Using piped links we can direct readers to the correct article and, in cases where this is desirable (particularly where there is a significant difference between the modern and archaic spellings), we could include the modern name in square brackets following the original one. mgiganteus1 (talk) 11:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I did ask before editing :-) Jon kare (talk) 13:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on List of giant squid specimens and sightings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)