Talk:List of lost inventions

Invention High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science High‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article needs a description

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article needs a description of what counts as a "lost invention". Also, if it's merely a list, shouldn't the article title be "List of lost inventions"? Regards, DesertPipeline (talk) 07:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. It wouldn't be so bad if lost invention was not a redirect right back here, leaving the reader none the wiser as to what the subject actually is. As it stands the article looks like an indiscriminate list and it is not clear that all the things listed share anything in common. I'm not sure it would survive an AfD. Also, it is not clear what makes some entries "questionable" and some not. We need to define that too.

A "lost invention" must mean more than just "a thing they don't make anymore" for this to be a valid subject. If we can pin it down as "a genuine invention for which the manufacturing process has been lost and not recovered" then we can remove the entries that do not fit that and be left with a valid article. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have edited the article recently, and would like to know whether you think the concerns have been addressed. Dege31 (talk) 13:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wardenclyffe Tower

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would wireless power transmission through Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower count as a lost invention? Ninjatacoshell (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lunar landing

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't really see this, even as a misconception. Do people honestly believe we've forgotten how we got to the moon, rather than we don't currently have any vehicles capable of the feat? I can't find a source that states people feel it's a forgotten technology of the ancients. Bkatcher (talk) 20:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure whether there is a source that talks about it, but you can find similar claims if you search, although it's often associated with conspiracy theorists. Dege31 (talk) 12:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Charles Hatfield

Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should Charles Hatfield's mix of 23 chemicals for cloud seeding be included in this list? C7XWiki (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic