Talk:List of mosques in the United Kingdom

Todo-List

edit

In 2007 there are approximately 1,500 masaajid (mosques) in Britain. Various lists of these have been published of which the most comprehensive is at the muslims in Britain website and is displayed using Google Maps.

England

edit

Scotland

edit

Wales

edit

Content dispute - what should be included on this list?

edit

As the page is fully protected due to an edit war, perhaps it would be a good idea to resolve the issue. The issue being:

195.194.4.65 said: The mosques removed from this page are not considered 'mosques' to the majority of muslims and should be included in a separate page for Ahmadiyyah places of worship

...so can we define "mosque" for the purposes of inclusion on this list? --Pontificalibus (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Mosque is well defined in its main article Mosque. What more do we need? It's a place of Islamic worship, where Muslims pray 5 times a day. The removal of the certain mosques is mainly because many Muslims do not consider Ahmadis to be Muslims and hence their place of worship are often referred to as anything but a mosque by those Muslims. This is why there so much antagonism to the list of mosques belonging to the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. That's the actual issue being raised here.
  • However removing those particular lists or separating them from the rest of the mosque list in order to comply with many Muslim's opinions would in my opinion result in discrimination. Hope that helps! Peaceworld111 (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for clearing that up. So the list is of "muslim places of worship" including Ahmadiyya mosques. I have a feeling there might be a lot of muslim places of worship in the UK - do we want to restrict this list to notable ones - mosques that have a Wikipedia article or might reasonable be expected to have one in the future, or can any mosque be included provided there is some sort of reference to show it exists? Personally I'd be inclined to go with the former as Wikipedia is not a directory. --Pontificalibus (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
I suppose there are about 1500 mosques in the uk? and we wouldn't want that many here. In my opinion those mosques should be kept that at least have an image or an article, otherwise it can be difficult defining a notable mosque. There are other notable or relatively notable mosques, that have neither...don't know what to do with that? ...maybe remove them?Peaceworld111 (talk) 22:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I propose that the list should be restricted to mosques that are notable. This is compatible with Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Selection criteria. Notability can be established either by linking to a Wikipedia article on the mosque or by citing sources that establish that the mosque would qualify for a Wikipedia article.

Reasons to qualify as notable include being in a historically or architecturally significant building (e.g. a listed building), or being the earliest-established, most important or largest mosque of an Islamic school or branch in the UK. Do not be misled by the large number of Wikipedia articles on British churches – many of these are notable only because they are historic buildings.

Three of the current-listed mosques do not have linked articles: Faizan-e-Madina Mosque in Peterborough has a link that claims it to be "The largest mosque in Cambridgeshire" – this might be sufficient for notability. The Al-Jamia Suffa-Tul-Islam Grand Mosque in Bradford claims to accommodate 8,000 worshippers – this would be notable but no source is provided. The Exeter Mosque does not appear to be sufficiently notable, based on this BBC report.

I will edit the lead paragraph to specify the need for notability. I plan to remove any non-notable entries later, after giving other editors a chance to challenge the notability requirement or to add sources to establish notability. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:42, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of mosques in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:22, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

the "groups"

edit

groups need to be improved, perhaps get rid of them completely Thinkingsalmon (talk) 21:57, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply