Talk:List of national flowers

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Trgnhn in topic Vietnam

Merge (I)

edit

This page and plants chosen to represent geographical areas cover the same topic. I feel they should be merged. Any views? SP-KP 13:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Support Merge. --Melburnian 14:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Support Merge. --Mais oui! 15:31, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merge (II)

edit

"It has been suggested that National emblem#Plants (National flora) be merged into this article or section. (Discuss)"

Canada

edit

Re-organized Canadian provinces and territories in order from western-most to eastern-most, and added Alberta. --Asnider (talk) 02:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

China

edit

China has no official floral emblem

it has been discussed in the People Congress for years, but so far no resolution has been passed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.156.38 (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

ROC

edit

The Republic of China government, which overthrew the Qing empire in 1911, named the plum blossom (also known as ume) the national floral emblem for its fortitude and courage (plum blossoms bloom in the dead of winter) and continues to recognize it as such to this day. However, having lost the Chinese civil war to the current communist government, this official recognition of the plum blossom as a national floral symbol is now limited to Taiwan, where the Republic of China government resides in exile from Mainland China.

This is totally wrong and misleading, ROC adopted ume as national floral emblem in 1964.--刻意(Kèyì) 01:51, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Spain and the Carnation

edit

This article is a mix of fantasy and romantic embellishment, as well as giving facts that are more likely from Washington Irvine or a bad Francoist propaganda movie. The "seedy side"? "Gypsy's lapels"? "thrown into bullrings"? "Caprice"? Not really neutral, information-centred terms, as well as far removed from reality and bordering on offensive. I suggest it be reduced to the bare minimum.Will (talk) 11:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Error

edit

In the first box, it is labeled "Africa" but contains non-African divisions like Sikkim and Afghanistan. This needs to be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.200.232 (talk) 22:18, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Floral emblem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:36, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Palestine

edit

"Palestine's national flower would be 'Palestinian Poppy'."
Palestine has no official floral emblem.
In addition, there is no flower called "Palestinian Poppy",
The link actually redirects to "Anemone coronaria" and there is no reference to the alleged flower in any source I could find other than this section.
"Palestinian flowers reflect the country itself"
It's a matter of debate, but Palestine isn't actually a country.
"its ancientness/antiquity, its gentleness,"
The term "Palestinian People" is less than 50 years old, so I cant really understand this "ancientness" part.
"and the fact that it is at the same time part of the Mediterranean basin to the west and part of the vast desert to the east."
how does THAT has anything to do with flowers?

This whole section is just a bunch of bogus claims.

What qualifies Nasser Abufarha to choose the national flower of Palestine? --ארינמל (talk) 21:37, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Floral emblem of Belgium

edit

Dear,

Being Belgian,I've never heard of a national flower for my country so I was asking myself from where was coming the red poppy referenced on this article (unsourced) ?

I agree that the red poppy is a common flower here in Belgium but I'm not aware of anything official about it (or even unofficial).

The only flowers "recognized" are the swamp iris present on the flag of the Brussel-Capital region https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drapeau_de_la_R%C3%A9gion_de_Bruxelles-Capitale, traditionally recognized as the floral emblem of this region, and the Gaillardia, official floral emblem of Wallonia region since the 12/03/2016 source.

If nobody comes with a source or an explanation I suggest to delete this flower from this list.

I guess it's coming from the[Remembrance poppy] and to[the poem In Flanders Fields], but not to the country itself.

Benzebuth198 (talk) 13:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sounds a reasonable assumption. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced entries

edit

This talkpage is full of complaints of readers who find their own countries getting ascribed "national flowers" they've never heard of. The entire article is a nightmare of unsourced claims. It gives the impression as if the huge majority of countries worldwide had national flowers or floral "emblems". Why would they? As this problem has apparently been festering for years, I'm going to take the radical step to eliminate each and every entry in the list that isn't reliably sourced. Which might well amount to more than 90% of the page; I don't know yet. Please reinclude only properly sourced entries (and note that websites such as https://www.theflowerexpert.com/content/aboutflowers/national-flowers do not count). Fut.Perf. 06:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

My edit was reverted [1] by DarkDancer06 (talk · contribs), without participation here on talk, with the argument that "not every entry is unsourced; the one I found for the floral emblem of Spain is backed up by others". This revert is unacceptable on three levels: first, if "not every" entry was unsourced, the proper reaction would have been to reinstate only the sourced ones; instead, DarkDancer06 reinstated the entire section on European countries, including all the patently unsourced ones. Second, the Spanish entry in fact is unsourced, if I'm not quite mistaken. It has a single footnote, to a Blogspot page, but that page (unless I'm missing something) supports only the story about how the carnation was introduced to Spain by Charles I, but not the crucial claim that this gives it the status of a national emblem today. Third, a Blogspot page is of course not a reliable source in the first place.
As a temporary compromise, I'm going to reinstate my removal with the exception of the Spanish entry, but I'm tagging that one with {citation needed} and {unreliable source}; I will remove it again in a few days if the sourcing doesn't get improved by then. Fut.Perf. 18:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
There are other sources that back up the information about Charles I introducing the first carnation to Spain, but they're all in Spanish. Another source is a Spanish TV series, but I can't include that. I'll look through the other sources and try and decide which one is more reliable. Thank you. User:DarkDancer06 User talk:DarkDancer06 22:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Just to make sure there's no misunderstanding: sourcing for the information "about Charles I introducing the first carnation" isn't really the main issue here. What we need, first and foremost, is sourcing for the contention that the carnation is a national emblem. That is quite orthogonal to the truth of the Charles I story (which, incidentally, I have no particular reason to doubt). Fut.Perf. 21:45, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oh right okay, I understand now. Yes I can't find any "reliable sources" that state the red carnation is the national flower of Spain, though I know it is. Thank you! User:DarkDancer06 User talk:DarkDancer06 13:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Floral emblem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Floral emblem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Floral emblem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hong Kong and Bauhinia

edit

Why is Hong Kong not in the list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.40.211.133 (talk) 04:23, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Belarus

edit

The (unofficial) national flower of Belarus is wild blue flax,[1] Centaurea.

  1. Flax is known only as a cultivated plant.
  2. Centaurea = cornflower etc.
  1. ^ James Minahan. The complete guide to national symbols and emblems, Vol. 1. Greenwood Press. 2009.

What is it? Creuzbourg (talk) 12:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Would this read better as a table?

edit

The current layout feels extremely messy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by An anonymous username, not my real name (talkcontribs) 13:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 September 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 00:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


Floral emblemList of national flowers – The present name is very confusing, and suggests floral emblems of any kind, but this is the list of national flowers, a redirect which already goes here. The rename would be WP:CONSISTENT with most of the rest of what is listed at Lists of national symbols.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  00:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – MaterialWorks 16:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Comment. The article includes subnational floral emblems as well. Will that be an issue? SigPig2 (talk) 03:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Comment2. The legislation that the US Senate passed and Pres Reagan signed used the term "floral emblem". It also seems to be used on *some* US websites, like Merriam-Webster, Collins, Rose.org, https://www.sos.mo.gov/symbol/floral (obviously, someone showed them)... so I don't think USAns find it confusing.
My own preference would be to have this article just be about Floral emblems in general, and then List of floral emblems -- again, national only or subnational as well?:). SigPig2 (talk) 04:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. This page is a list of national flowers, not an explanation of what a floral emblem is.
--MtPenguinMonster (talk) 11:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Weak oppose, per my above. SigPig2 (talk) 04:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Plants has been notified of this discussion. – MaterialWorks 16:58, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Geography has been notified of this discussion. – MaterialWorks 16:59, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

UOI

edit

Turkish National flowers 💐🌷🌹🪷🌸🌺🌼🌻 5.197.227.211 (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Zimbabwe

edit

Added new information and references for Zimbabwe's national flower Slartibartfastest (talk) 19:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Vietnam

edit

Vietnam has no official national flower. Please remove. Trgnhn (talk) 05:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply