Talk:List of object–relational mapping software

[Untitled]

Really pleased that this page was started. Having a list of ORM tools is really useful, but having the list elsewhere was just too close to spam. What would be nice is some kind of comparison between the tools. Erichero 10:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Nice spam page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.221.125.7 (talk) 13:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Diamond Binding was removed a few versions ago, why? It's clearly an ORM package. And also one of my favourite. What makes it any less of a candidate than a heap of shit like d00dads? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.170.249 (talk) 00:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

On 5 March 2008 75% of the links were removed by Hu12... I'm partial to BuzzSQL, but who's to say what "well-known" is? My experience in JAVA ORM says that Torque in particular is certainly well known. No one could be versed enough on all the different languages that have an ORM to make a decision on adding or removing one ORM tool or the other. 64.94.198.252 (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks like Hu12 had a vendetta against d&c diamond binding in particular. I came here from answers.com, and thought the article had been deleted due to vandalism. Looking more it seems like any mention of them has been expunged from wiki. You add any mention to their domain and your edit fails - pretty incredible - im not up on any wikipedia blacklisting stuff - but going by the answers.com article it didnt look very spammy. Probably this crap should be reviewed by someone who knows what they are doing 150.101.16.233 (talk) 04:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Isn't DB_DataObject a PHP ORM? In the PEAR repository. I don't see that in the list. I think there are more in PEAR too. 85.224.94.162 (talk) 17:19, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Notable?

Someone please explain the criteria for being "notable". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.181.115 (talk) 03:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

In the context of this article, it means meeting the list inclusion criteria. In this case there has been no discussions about it, so editors are assuming that the entries should have their own articles, or references that show notability. Alternatively, a list published in an independent, reliable source would work. --Ronz (talk) 05:00, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Ronz, I counted 40 ORMs listed on this page and you blindly deleted every JavaScript ORM you could find. Did you check to see if the 40 you let remain are "notable" to your standards? Ideogon (talk)

There is absolutely no reason to accept certain software based on it's popularity, this is a free encyclopedia. Javascript is a popular language, and as this page is directly linked to from the 'ORM' wikipedia article, those wishing to find an ORM application for their particular need will come here to find one. So unless you know what you are talking about, which you have well proven that you do not, I highly suggest paging moderator who does, and not blindly removing anything 'YOU', personally think doesn't belong here.jscix —13:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC).

I'm removing all entries that don't have their own articles to prevent the continuing WP:SPAM and WP:V violations.

Anyone want to discuss other solutions to these problems? --Ronz (talk) 14:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

hiberlite

Would someone who understands hiberlite well enough to write about it please add it to the C++ table? Waitak (talk) 15:41, 8 November 2011 (UTC)