Talk:List of people buried at sea

English Channel

An IP editor contends the English Channel is not a sea, and therefore people buried in the English Channel cannot be included in this page. The editor has twice removed such people from the list - here and more aggressively here.

The IP's argument, per the edit summary, is the English Channel is not an ocean. However this conflicts with:

• The dictionary definition of "sea" as "a) : a great body of salt water that covers much of the earth and b) a body of salt water of second rank more or less landlocked (eg. the Mediterranean sea)";
• The definition of "sea" in this marine textbook as "a body of salt water that is smaller than an ocean and more or less land-locked."; and
• Our own article on the English Channel, which refers to this body of water as "an arm of the Atlantic Ocean" and notes alternate names such as "British Sea" and Ptolemy's "Oceanus Brittanicus"

I suggest that as dictionaries and marine textbooks both define "sea" in a way that includes the English Channel, this article can reasonably include those buried int he English Channel as people who have been buried at sea. Other views are welcome as always - talking here is the alternative to what might otherwise descend into a series of additions and reverts. Euryalus (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

3O Response: Hi, I'm here to provide a third opinion... although there seems to be only one represented on this talk page. Would the IP editor like to discuss this matter? My first impression is to agree with Euryalus, although I am only going from my own understanding of the phrase "buried at sea". I'm happy to be educated as to why this would exclude the English Channel (or any other large section of non-landlocked water). Cheers, Blippy (talk) 12:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Blippy (talk) 12:30, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

There's been no action on this issue for ~9 days, and given the nature of the edits (sky is blue, grass is green, EC is sea) and the rather one-sided communication (tremendously unlikely that the IP editor ever explains this satisfactorily), I unilaterally decided it was better to revert the changes and proceed from there. — chro • man • cer  14:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good to me! Blippy (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of people buried at sea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110503025832/http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/05/osama-bin-laden-body-headed-for-burial-at-sea-officials-say.html to http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/05/osama-bin-laden-body-headed-for-burial-at-sea-officials-say.html/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)