Talk:List of people with ovarian cancer

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Name

edit

I don't know who revised the existing list and renamed it as the "List of notable women who have survived ovarian cancer" when the overwhelming majority on the list did not survive the disease. I moved it for that reason to "List of notable women who have battled ovarian cancer". Makes sense to me. Sesquipedalian 16:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Moved to even simpler and less colloquial "list of women with ovarian cancer". The lead should spell out details of inclusion criteria. Zodon (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Rename

edit

Might this list be renamed "List of people with ovarian cancer"? It includes Robert Eads, who was male-identified. Graymornings(talk) 17:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Just notable women? Not just all women is it?

edit

Hello,

Seems like the title is misleading. I can't list the people I know, can I? Does it just need an obituary citation mentioning cause of death to make the list?Parabolooidal (talk) 19:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I tried to change it to "Notable women with ovarian cancer" but that violates WP:MOS. So it has to be someone newsworthy, preferably with a Wikipedia article of her own; you can't just include anyone. Quis separabit? 20:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


NOTABILITY REQUIREMENTS

edit

As per WP rules on "stand alone lists": Notability guidelines apply to the inclusion of stand-alone lists and tables. Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group. One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.

There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists, although non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations are touched upon in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. Editors are still urged to demonstrate list notability via the grouping itself before creating stand-alone lists.

There does not appear to be a requirement, unless I am overlooking something, for two separate references as has been averred by another editor, to qualify to be on the this list. If there are entries deemed non-notable which editors believe should be removed then I guess deletion by individual with explanation may be the best way to handle that. Respectfully submitted, Quis separabit? 00:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

==Refs needed==

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

DONE!!!!!!! Quis separabit? 04:24, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Silly histogram?

edit

Why is the histogram by age of death silly? —EncMstr (talk) 22:22, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of women with ovarian cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on List of women with ovarian cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of women with ovarian cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of women with ovarian cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of women with ovarian cancer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply