Talk:List of performance analysis tools

RapiTime

Added RapiTime to list of performance analysis tools (for C) and also started new section for Ada. No external links used. Hope this is within the guidelines - it is equivalent to all the other listings. (85.118.3.38 (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC))

RapiTime? So where is it now? Where is VTune? Are there no other Microsoft Windows tools? 84.9.165.251 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

list by platform

Might also make sense to list by platform(s) supported. --Kvng (talk) 20:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

CodeAnalyst Support

From the article: CodeAnalyst as a free GUI based code profiler for AMD hardware x86 based machines from AMD.

Wrong: CodeAnalyst works on both Intel and AMD CPUs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.253.60.245 (talk) 18:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of performance analysis tools. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131011220339/http://www.delphitools.info/samplingprofiler/ to http://www.delphitools.info/samplingprofiler/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of performance analysis tools. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130521144234/http://insightprofiler.productivity-boost.com/ to http://insightprofiler.productivity-boost.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of performance analysis tools. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130919162818/http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/heterogeneous-computing/codexl/ to http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/heterogeneous-computing/codexl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Advertisement style featuring of `timemory`

@Jonrmadsen: seems to have added the tool they developed in an advertisement-style text. My objections to that are

• It is put at equal to the time utility on linux, while we know that timemory is not built-in.
• The supporting text under the "General purpose, language independent" section doesn't belong there. It belongs to the "What it does" column of the table, where it seems you've detailed it rightly.
• The text

a modular C++ toolkit for creating performance analysis tools which provides numerous command-line tools and libraries as a by-product of its flexibility and reusability.

seems vague to me, if I want to find out if I can profile say, individual functions or find memory leaks etc.
I request you to read more of the current article and make the tone of your edits coherent with the rest. If you wish, you can make a whole new page about the tool and link people to that page, while using excerpts of it in this page.
Thank you and kudos for developing the awesome tool too!
(See this section on help for pinging me Help:Notifications :-)
AdithyaKL (talk) 19:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)