Talk:List of political scandals in New Zealand

Still to add

There are several important items which still need to be added here - most importantly the Winebox Inquiry, but also Kim Dotcom, Novopay, and the Rickards/Nicholas case - but at least this is a start. There's also a lot of references to be done - the linked articles will easily provide some of them. Grutness...wha? 11:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

External links to lists of NZ scandals - many probably worth adding

• A Brief History Of Political Scandal In New Zealand - From Colin Moyle To Darren Hughes - a blog, but the items mentioned are scandals nonetheless
• David Farrar: Parliamentary resignations, Herald article on the history of resigning MPs
• Parliamentary scandals, again a blog, and a bald list (more in the comments section underneath), but many of those listed are worth adding here

Grutness...wha? 00:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Maybe the first political scandal? James Stuart-Wortley stood in the 1853 election. He was upper class and financially loaded, but pretty young. At the time, the active and passive voting age was set at 21, and somebody challenged him to be underage. Stuart-Wortley got his lawyers in who all confirmed that it was all legal. Turns out that the concerns were correct, and he was 20 when he got elected to the House of Representatives. I once read up on it in contemporary newspaper articles, but this is not even noted in his article. Schwede66 07:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Didn't know about that one. Most of the online information is about recent scandals - it would be good to have some early ones on the list too. It's possible AK Grant's The Unauthorised Version: A Cartoon History of New Zealand will have something about it. Grutness...wha? 11:17, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

ISTR there were also some early scandals relating to land purchases that helped to fuel the New Zealand wars, but don't know any details. Grutness...wha? 11:20, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

BLP

The WP:BLP implications of this article as it currently stands are pretty problematic: allegations, etc, about living people are listed (sometimes in a fairly tabloid style) without noting what their responses were, or the end results. Nick-D (talk) 11:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of political scandals in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100204112322/http://www.lawsociety.org.nz/publications_and_submissions/lawtalk/2010_issues/lawtalk%2C_issue_743/the_legitimacy_of_judicial_review_of_executive_decision-making to http://www.lawsociety.org.nz/publications_and_submissions/lawtalk/2010_issues/lawtalk%2C_issue_743/the_legitimacy_of_judicial_review_of_executive_decision-making

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Additional scandals

Why has the investigation into the Labour party by the SFO not been included? And the scandal relating to Speaker Trevor Mallard making a false rape claim, and using taxpayer funds for his defence.

I can cite the below sources.

Labour SFO https://sfo.govt.nz/media-cases/media-releases/sfo-files-charges-in-labour-party-donations-case/

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/serious-fraud-office-charges-six-people-in-labour-party-donations-case/O7VHPWAS3XIKFM65NUUXOIOONI/

Trevor Mallard Scandal https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/trevor-mallard-defamation-case-settling-speakers-false-rape-claim-against-staffer-costs-taxpayers-333000-national/P2J7YX4WTQM3EZWLBCPAWPZGFM/

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2021/03/national-renews-calls-for-speaker-trevor-mallard-s-resignation-amid-new-revelations-over-rape-comments.amp.html

Thanks, 114.23.214.107 (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Feel free to add it. It’s questionable whether the taxpayer paying for a legal bill being part of a scandal, though, as that’s common practice. Schwede66 17:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)