Talk:List of popes (graphical)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
List of popes (graphical) is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured list |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
[Untitled]
editThe featured listing is very well deserved - very well done to all the contributors who have brought this page to the standard achieved. --JohnArmagh 5 July 2005 07:00 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Well, for the record, I think we copied the German version, and then translated and tidied. Perhaps we ought to tell them where we have found some mistakes - a diff between the original version and the current version should pick up the infelicities in the original. -- ALoan (Talk) 5 July 2005 11:40 (UTC)
Something is wrong with this graph. Pius IX's bar graph seems rather small, and is in fact smaller than Gregory XVI, when in truth it should be considerably bigger than most of the ones around it, being he holds the longest pontificate after Peter. --Supersexyspacemonkey 20:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Looks OK to me - the labels are to the right of the relevant line - does that help? -- ALoan (Talk) 20:53, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Bar colours
editGreat list -- just one small nitpick: The red and green bar colours chosen are very difficult to tell apart for me, and, I'd venture to guess, to others with red-green colour blindness. Would it be possible e.g. to use a darker (and/or more blue-containing) green?
How about the following example, using blue and red (do many people have red/blue colour blindness?)
Until 250
editHTH -- ALoan (Talk) 13:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Looks fine to me -- and from what I've read about colourblindness, I believe those colours should be easily distinguishable to anyone whose vision is not fully monochromatic (or, well, missing). Thanks!
- OMHalck 15:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Mistake
editPope Nicholas I 855 – 867
browser problem
editI can see this very nice list using Safari, but all the graphics part seems to be invisible on Firefox 2.0. I'll play around with the FF settings a little. DGG 06:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Font size
editIs there a way to alter the size of the font in the lists? My eyes suck and the text is much too small, and I'm sure the same is true for a lot of other people out there. Kaotac (talk) 08:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Really low-quality
editThe timelines generated on here are super low-resolution and not very easy to read. Is there a way they could be rendered at a higher resolution? If not could they be replaced with normal files with links put on top of them? DemonDays64 (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)