Talk:List of positions on Jerusalem

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

This article was nominated for merging with Status of Jerusalem on 27 February, 2021. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Merge.

86 embassies are in Tel Aviv, thus these 86 states have a 'leaning no' position on Jerusalem as Israel's capital. Why are the majority of them not in the table? 2001:8003:64E6:9301:550B:FF1B:174B:4500 (talk) 02:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Serbia and Kosovo

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Press articles dated September 4, 2020 indicate that Serbia and Kosovo intend to open embassies in Jerusalem, which would require an update to the article. Sources: https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-kosovo-to-be-first-muslim-majority-nation-to-open-jerusalem-embassy/, https://www.timesofisrael.com/serbia-to-move-embassy-to-jerusalem-mostly-muslim-kosovo-to-recognize-israel/.One-Off Contributor (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Confusing

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The list is misleading, the intro speaks about sovereignty over E and W Jerusalem. But then the table has been completed by reference to whether this or that entity has recognized either part or all of Jerusalem as capital. It does not follow that recognition of Jerusalem as capital of Israel means that the recognizing entity agrees that Israel is sovereign (over any part or all). I amended the most egregious example, the US, where it was made explicit that the US recognition did not mean recognition of sovereignty. Selfstudier (talk) 18:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic