Talk:List of presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate, 1911–1913 page were merged into List of presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate on 10 November 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Langdon
editWhy was John Langdon's PPT term broken up during the 1st Congress? --Markles 02:25, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Emeritus?
editWhat's the basis for this? Many other people have continued as senators after serving as President pro tempore. (Including the ones we mention - Byrd was emeritus from 1995 to 2001, and Thurmond from 1987 to 1995, and again from 2001 to 2003.) The same goes for Styles Bridges (1955-1961), Arthur Vandenberg (1949-1951), and Kenneth McKellar (1947-1949), just in the post-WWII era.
Is this a formal title? If so, a citation would be in order. john k (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Time as senator request
editI feel it would be useful if the time they were senator was added, next to the time as pro tempore. Thoughts? PrairieKid (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Images
editImages should be added to the table. MB298 (talk) 04:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
2009-2015
editIn the Emeritus section ... (which is peculiar, and maybe redundant) someone wrote that no one was eligible to be President Pro Tempore from 2009-2015.
This is false. Citation: the full list of Presidents Pro-Tempore on this page.
& The Senate website just says tradition is to choose the most senior member of the majority party of the Senate.
I suspect the error may have been vandalism, as the information is not hard to find and those terms correlate with the Obama Administration. Dtibsyh (talk) 04:52, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Should “pro administration” be changed to federalist
editShould “pro administration” be changed to federalist? Ayunipear (talk) 14:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- No, because there were no organized political parties prior to the 4th Congress. Drdpw (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2024 (UTC)