Talk:List of products using ARM processors

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of ARM architecture was copied or moved into List of applications of ARM cores with this edit on 22 June, 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Architecture vs. Brand

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Qualcomm uses the Snapdragon brand to cover their Scorpion (Coretex-A8) and Krait (Cortex-A15) based processors. So when listing the Applications of ARM Cores, please name the architecture of the Snapdragon core. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.231.12 (talk) 19:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Application in ARM means no embedded

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

So the best is use another terminology.--Lagoset (talk) 12:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Lagoset: Your word isn't good enough; we need reliable, and ideally, third-party sources for this. What/where are they? -- dsprc ^[talk] 16:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The content on this page appears to be copied verbatim from http://www.arm.com/products/processors/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.52.192.26 (talk) 20:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Offending sections have now been removed. -- dsprc ^[talk] 15:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Delete This

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is marketing fluff, and has no place in Wikipedia. I think it should be deleted. Brycen (talk) 23:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Brycen: Your PROD has been rejected; are free to AfD it, however. I removed the copyright violations which were mostly marketing bullshit from ARM's PR Dept. You articulate no rationale for your position or desire for deletion. What are your specific objections? -- dsprc ^[talk]

Rename this Page

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

the word "core" needs to be changed to "microarchitecture", to maintain consistency with the other pages on this topic, and to align with the correct meaning of english words. A "core" is a single instance of a compute unit (some of these chips have more than one), the correct term to describe these products is "microarchitecture". 110.143.72.26 (talk) 8 June 2021 (UTC)

The term "ARM core" has been used for decades in the ARM world. Changing to "ARM microarchitecture" would be confusing against the other term "ARM architecture". • Sbmeirow • Talk • 14:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic