This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Weimar Republic?
editShouldn’t the Weimar Republic be included? I don’t know if it counts but it feels like it should… Snizzbut (talk) 14:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Crowned Republics?
editThis term is nonsensical from a political science point of view. There is no such thing. A republic is a state whose governmental system has no hereditary monarch. A monarchy is a state which has such. Neither term implies either democracy or despotism. A monarchy can be as limited as Japan or as absolute as Saudi Arabia but it remains a monarchy. Likewise, a republic can be as democratic as Iceland or as tyrannical as Enver Hoxha's Albania; both are republics. The notion of a ″Crowned Republic″ is as self contradictory as a short giant or a progressive conservative, the two terms are opposite in meaning. The proper term for a monarchy where the sovereign is a de facto or de jure figurehead has always been a ″Constitutional Monarchy″. This is even true of a limited monarchy like the United Kingdom, which has no written constitution, but where the monarch has no actual political rôle beyond fulfilling ceremonial functions. For a passing moment I wondered if I'd lost my mind, or if political science definitions had been revised while I wasn't looking, so I rang up a friend of mine who is a professor of history to confirm the nature of these definitions. He assures me that the academic, political science definitions of republic and monarchy have not changed. I have no say over the format of Wikipedia, but I would suggest that the issue be put to the actual, named editors, and that this ersatz category be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D08:2678:84E0:0:0:0:F33D (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Missing republic
editPlease add the oft overlooked republic of Vermont 1777-1791 47.156.202.189 (talk) 02:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Table
editWhat do you think about converting this article into a single large table, similar to List of empires?
Besides name, start/end year, duration, we could have additionally columns such like region, and republic type. Grillofrances (talk) 20:34, 27 May 2024 (UTC)