This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Wikipedia convention is to bold the title (or approximate occurence thereof) when it first occurs in the article. Thanks Dysprosia 05:03, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Dysprosia... yes, I'm aware of that. However, a list is not, strictly speaking, an article, and the bolded text was not the article title. Futhermore, the bolding of that text is visually unattractive. Those were the multiple reasons behind my edit. -- Seth Ilys 05:06, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Rivers discharging into the Missouri or the Mississippi should be ordered according to the side of the basin (right or left) along these major rivers. The lists resulting can be used to see the asymmetry of river basins, very clear in Iowa, and corresponding risk of flooding. --Fev 03:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fev (talk • contribs)