This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
G.J. Stewart, J.P. Nielsen, J.M. Caldwell, A.R. Cloutier (2002). "Water Resources Data - Maine, Water Year 2001"(PDF). Water Resources Data - Maine, Water Year 2001. Retrieved 2006-05-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) is a source that could be used for more Maine rivers. I didn't create new articles from it, but did just do a sweep of adding river flow data from it to existing articles. GRBerry01:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I'm adding all water bodies with "River" in their name, from the federal Geographic Names Information System. This will include rivers that are only tidal -- do other editors approve? One drawback of going with a list of things named "River" is that it tends to skew towards coastal rivers -- there are plenty of quite large watercourses in the interior of Maine which are named "Stream" or even "Brook". In New Hampshire, we solved this by including any stream or brook which was longer than 10 miles. Something similar could work here... --Ken Gallager12:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Given that this list is well below 50% blue links, I'm in no hurry to see even more things added. That solution could well be viable, and I have no objection to any such existing articles being added. But let's not flood with redlinks until we get the coverage of the current list more complete. GRBerry12:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
