Talk:List of royal weddings
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For whatever reason this keeps getting deleted, please discuss why you think it should not be included, rather than just removing it. An edit summary would be useful. - Thanks.--Egghead06 (talk) 05:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- It is probably being removed because it is wrong. They were married in the Cathedral of Notre Dame d'Eu not the Chateau. I have no idea where the Cathedral of Notre Dame d'Eu is though.--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Sub-sections of locations
editThere is no need to group marriages by marriage location. Instead of having sub-sections named "X Church", add the location to the entry.--Zoupan 13:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of royal weddings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110501055956/http://www.officialroyalwedding2011.org/ to http://www.officialroyalwedding2011.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Other royal English weddings
editWhy is there a gap between 1382 and 1795 for royal weddings in the United Kingdom? Henry VII married Elizabeth of York at Westminster Abbey in 1486 and Mary I married Philip II of Spain at Winchester Cathedral in 1554, and I'm sure there must be others. Is there some restriction on this list that isn't obvious? Leschnei (talk) 03:16, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
This list makes no sense. There were thousands of rulers during history and most of them were married. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:AB88:50C3:1880:64D6:D91:43ED:25F2 (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- This article only lists notable royal weddings - i.e. those we have articles on. Sure, there have probably been millions more royal weddings in general, but if we don't have an article on it, it shouldn't be listed here. ansh666 20:24, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- That is a totally arbitrary criteria for such a list. A way better criteria would be to limit the list to weddings of reigning monarchs and heirs apparent/presumptive. --Marbe166 (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- No, that sounds like a totally arbitrary criterion - and would still result in an unmanageably large list full of poorly-sourced entries. The current method is the only real way it can be reasonably maintained. The solution for its current limited scope is to make articles on the other royal weddings - and I'm sure there are many - that meet WP:N, and then add them in. ansh666 01:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
- That is a totally arbitrary criteria for such a list. A way better criteria would be to limit the list to weddings of reigning monarchs and heirs apparent/presumptive. --Marbe166 (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2019 (UTC)