Talk:List of ships of the Free French Naval Forces
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Free French
editAs per [[1]], removed ships that sailed with the Allies after 1940, but not under the Free French flag. This is not vandalism, ok? ;) PpPachy 22:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
More Ships?
editShould Lorraine battleship be part of the Free France navy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.227.168 (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
- as per the previous comment (see updated link at [2]), no. PpPachy (talk) 16:47, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Richelieu needs to be added, but it wasn't from the beginning, they (the free french) only managed to capture it in 1942. So active FFNF 1942 onwards. An editor for ww2 stuff (talk) 11:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on List of ships of the Free French Naval Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060712131820/http://perso.orange.fr:80/bertrand.daubigny/GueFNFL.htm to http://perso.orange.fr/bertrand.daubigny/GueFNFL.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)