Talk:List of solar eclipses in the 16th century

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Primefac in topic Requested move 5 August 2022

Requested move 5 August 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to "List of <type> eclipses in the nth century". This means the solar eclipses will stay where they are and the lunar eclipses will be moved to match that formatting. Primefac (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


– The title format should be consistent for both types of eclipses. This means that either the solar eclipse lists should be moved to the "List of nth-century solar eclipses" title to match the lunar eclipse lists, or the lunar eclipse lists should be moved to the "List of lunar eclipses in the nth century" title to match the solar eclipse lists. Please state which format you prefer (i.e., whether you support moving the solar eclipse lists and oppose moving the lunar eclipse lists, or vice versa, support moving the lunar eclipse lists and oppose moving the solar eclipse lists). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Prefer first version ("List of solar eclipses in nth century"). Don't mind change of lunar eclipses to same format ("list of lunar eclipses in nth century"). Walrasiad (talk) 14:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • As an extremely loose analogy, since articles are titled History of [country], not [Country (adjective)] history, these lists should be List of [type] eclipses in the nth century. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 12:59, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.