Talk:List of species endemic to Mendocino County, California

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal List of species endemic to Mendocino County, California is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lead section

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Rather than continuing to unproductively and unilaterally revert Look2See1 (talk · contribs)'s repeated violations of MOS:LEAD's call for a descriptive sentence at the start of an article (and for not cramming the article title in if it doesn't fit into a proper sentence) I've asked for additional opinions at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. Please see discussion there. —David Eppstein (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The old lead was closer to MOS, but didn't quite cover the list inclusion criteria or have any wikilinks. Look2See1's sections and wikilinks were a useful improvement that shouldn't have been reverted along with the change to the lead section. I've made a compromise revision. Look2See1, please review MOS:LIST, particularly the section on layout, before making any further changes. Ibadibam (talk) 23:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I disambiguated one of your links, but otherwise the new version looks good — thanks! —David Eppstein (talk) 00:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic