This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leaders by year, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Leaders by yearWikipedia:WikiProject Leaders by yearTemplate:WikiProject Leaders by yearLeaders by year articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Latest comment: 8 months ago5 comments4 people in discussion
There are far too many "List of state leaders in 0000" pages. The state leaders in 1960 is very nearly the same as state leaders in 1961. It is very combersome to verifiy, maintain, and navigate the hundereds of pages like this. For earlier times it should merged into lists of state leaders by century (Such as this page). For more recent centuries, they can split by either decade or another method. tahcchat22:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
I fully agree with the changes you're making. I notice most of the pages going back to the 20th century BC include Irish kings, when none of them before the 5th century can be considered historical, and even in the 5th and 6th century the names, succession, status and especially dates are very uncertain. I also noticed kings of Alba Longa on some of the pages, who are also legendary. Once the pages are reorganised to be more manageable, they need to be looked at to remove anything that's not actually history. --Nicknack009 (talk) 21:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
I also find the whole idea of separating these per year impractical, and I can't see the use of it at all. Why would anybody need a list of all state leaders per year? These can all be merged into decades IMO. --OpenFuture (talk) 16:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
