Talk:List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001)
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001) page were merged into 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001) on 10 November 2023 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
 | This redirect is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | On 13 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center to List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001). The result of the discussion was MOVED. |
| On 23 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Speedy Delete?
editThis list is not non-sense. It is a sourced list of the tenents in WTC7 prior to that building's collapse. It is part of a series of list-articles, including One World Trade Center tenants (article started September 14th 2001) and Two World Trade Center tenants (article started September 17th 2001). Seabhcán 22:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Rename
editI'd like to rename these articles to the standard list style:
- World Trade Center tenants -> List of World Trade Center tenants
- One World Trade Center tenants -> List of tenants in World Trade Center One
- Two World Trade Center tenants -> List of tenants in World Trade Center Two
- Seven World Trade Center tenants -> List of tenants in World Trade Center Seven
Any objections? Seabhcán 08:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Requested move 13 April 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: MOVED. There has been no opposition. (non-admin closure) Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 16:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center → List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001) Requesting move because there is a brand new building and this article could lead to a false impression that the tenants occupy the new 7 WTC. --Aaron106 (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 17:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 23 December 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Clyde!Franklin! 18:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001) → List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center – I am requesting a page move because the title that I want this article changed to is a redirect to this same article: List of tenants in 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001). Also, there is no article about the tenants for the new 7 World Trade Center and it has been built for 16 years. --Darth-Wiki-Man (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. This proposed move does nothing to help clarity, in fact, it would only create confusion. I note that there is a proposal to split 7 World Trade Center and 7 World Trade Center (1987–2001); the two are independently notable and should have their own article. That would make this RM moot. 162 etc. (talk) 17:25, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: To form a clearer consensus echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. If you want to add the current tenants, then it would create justification for the move. As it stands, the proposed title would not accurately describe the contents of the article. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose: The new building is notable and it has had tenants too, so we should make it clear which building's tenants are being listed. — BarrelProof (talk) 04:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)