Talk:List of terrorist incidents in March 2018

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Berrely in topic Copyright problem removed

Austin Bombings

edit

It is now clear that the incidents are related so now the question is are they terrorism. Leave your thoughts below. StrikeDog (talk) 05:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

There's no apparent political motivation. Not terrorism (for the moment). Givibidou (talk) 14:00, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Koranion crazy unbelievable ? (mistakes correction and better source adding ok)

edit

'ISIL not a source" for deleting. ISIL is always confirming most reliable source of many attacks else nobody would know who behind. It is also in iraqinews so they take that as reliable. What was not terror if 3 entries deleted same time ? East ghouta in hand of rebels in text shooting rockets on marcet call themself Free syrian army not same Army. ISIL was also confirming drone killing but not same place and time etc. I can't make much at all just reading sometimes WP, iraqinews, SOHR or german news radio and NTV. 3 days nothing wrong before maybe outside help wanted ?

Death toll Ruanda 800 000 Burundi 300 000 before using machetes in racism conflict between Hutsi and Tutsi and more deaths by droughts and deseases in WW II after poison gas WW I 60 000 000 deaths most in asia after all destroyed and nothing to eat and new the nuclear weapons thread with zara bomba same about 400+m diameter pebble TNT 1000*stronger hiroshima.

| |20 |Shooting, Armed attacks |style="background:#B6FCB6;text-align:left"|21 |style="background:#B6FCB6;text-align:left"|0 |Kirkuk, Iraq |Islamic State claims responsibility for killing 21 people in attack, south of Kirkuk[1] |Islamic State |War in Iraq |- |21 |Different weapons |style="background:#B6FCB6;text-align:left"|10 (abducted) |style="background:#B6FCB6;text-align:left"|0 |Kirkuk, Iraq |10 police officers were likely to be abducted during clashes against IS, south of Kirkuk[2] |Islamic State |War in Iraq

References

Attributions

edit

There seems to be a culture of attributing attacks without a source. The fact that a group is operating in the area is not sufficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heliotom (talkcontribs) 16:33, 23 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Koranion: Please can we discuss the issue of attribution of attack perpetrators on this talk page. It's not constructive to continue as we are.Heliotom (talk) 14:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Heilbronn incident

edit

It was added (and edit-warred) by a new user, and none of the references mentions terrorism. The user's explanations in edit summaries are not convincing.I oppose adding the incident unless we have sources confirming that it was a terrorist attack.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I would like to mention that the police officially confirmed that the attack was politically motivated, which is included in the definition of what belongs to the list at it's top.--~~Sokrates2987

RfC: terrorist incidents list criteria

edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of terrorist incidents#RfC: List criteria. Levivich 18:00, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Boko_Haram_insurgency https://thewaythetruthandthelife.net/index/1_background/1-6_islamic/2018-alarms/2018-alarmsx.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 12:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

It has been in the article previously and presumably moved to Wikia when the material was judged non-notable--Ymblanter (talk) 12:53, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Ymblanter, oh sorry, I missed that. Thank's for bringing that up. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 13:19, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply