Talk:List of threatened rays
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from List of threatened rays appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 April 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Guitarfish
editGuitarfish aren't stingrays, are they? --178.197.237.54 (talk) 11:05, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Changed...including the wedgefishes. --178.197.237.54 (talk) 11:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of threatened rays. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120527175928/http://www.iucnredlist.org/about/red-list-overview to http://www.iucnredlist.org/about/red-list-overview
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of threatened rays. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130919214353/http://www.benthamscience.com/open/toanatj/articles/V003/1TOANATJ.pdf to http://www.benthamscience.com/open/toanatj/articles/V003/1TOANATJ.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Updating
editLooks like several species need to be updated to endangered/critically endangered, and scientific names need updating 2600:100C:B016:25FF:B17D:4F9E:CFD:48DC (talk) 23:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
There is also a problem with the red list icon not being correctly matched with the printed word: so for instance: Rhina ancylostoma has a CR icon up, but the word underneath is "vunerable". This issue applies to quite a few of the entries. — unsigned comment by FloweringOctopus (talk) 18:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- * Yes, thanks for that. There was extensive vandalism, longstanding and undetected, from what appears to be a Japanese vandal using several accounts. — Epipelagic (talk) 02:14, 24 July 2022 (UTC)