Talk:List of translations of the Quran

2000s

I removed this because the three translations side by side is just--putting three translations together by Project Gutenbgerg. It wasn't original work and the date is just the day they put it into their catalog--not a publishing date. gren グレン 13:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Mark extant vs lost translations

For the older translations, specially those before the printing press: it should be said for each of them whether it is still in existence, or whether it has been partially or wholly lost. Thanks! -- 77.21.99.8 (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Andalusian

I am sorry, but if Andalusian relates to Andalusian Spanish it is just a dialect from Spanish and the reference should be deleted. Unless they meant Andalusian Arabic, but anyway, there is no translation listed. Voj 2005 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:32, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Yiddish Quran

hi. The section of Yiddish Quran might need to be updated. http://forward.com/culture/162473/the-yiddish-quran/ Prsaucer1958 (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Indiscriminate lists violate Wikipedia policy

We have the policy WP:INDISCRIMINATE that prohibits using Wikipedia to build indiscriminate lists of things.

That's what this list article is turning out to be, unless some inclusion criteria are stated in the lead section, which is currently blank. We have all manner of obscure or otherwise non-notable translations, some even with spammy external links.

What are the criteria for including a translation in this list? ~Amatulić (talk) 21:33, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

I will add that several citations are blog sites (search the article for blogspot and wordpress, for example). This is not acceptable.

I propose this lead sentence for outlining criteria: "This is a list of translations of the Quran that were written by notable authors who have Wikipedia articles, or referenced in independent secondary reliable sources."

That should still allow inclusion of many items.

Any objections? Non-response equals concurrence, and there has been no response to the initial comment in this section for nearly 5 years. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Miscellaneous

How about Turkish? I don't see Turkish listed here...

This is a woeful article.

So, um, about seven hundred hundred years are missing. Where's the French of du Ryer, or the ~1600s English version derived from du Ryer's? Or, for that matter, thousands of others?

sir can you add Punjabi language also ?

persian

persian 182.185.122.183 (talk) 08:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)