Talk:List of tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong

Move request

List of tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong → List of vehicular tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong – or List of road tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong —

 Not done Malformed request. Please read the instructions at WP:Requested moves carefully and try again. Cheers, --Aervanath (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. In looking at the bridge and tunnel categories I don't see any breakout like the proposed vehicle from this nomination. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

List of tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong → List of vehicular tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong – Relisted. Restarting discussion correctly linked. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2012 (UTC) or List of road tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong – As per the scope of the list as defined in the lede, and to differentiate from the List of railway bridges and viaducts in Hong Kong and Category:Railway tunnels in Hong Kong. 218.250.159.95 (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

• Comment use "Road", railway systems use vehicles called trains. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 04:29, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
• Comment on reflection, why do we need separate lists? 70.24.251.71 (talk) 04:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
• Oppose as long as there is no list of non-vehicular tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong, like tunnels and bridges for pedestrians. (However, a merge like the one 70.24.251.71 suggests could be a good idea.) Pinut (talk) 09:57, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
  • There is one such list for railway bridges. And there is no reason not to have one for other bridges and tunnels. Road bridges and tunnels are grouped together in one list because they share information such as number of lanes, number of tubes, capacity, and daily usage. These aren't relevant to other types of bridges and tunnels. 119.237.156.246 (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
• Support. Reflect the topic. Bridges and tunnels are grouped together in one list because they are vehicular. Otherwise we should split along List of bridges in HK and List of tunnels in HK, vehicular, sewerage, water supply, electricity will all be in the same lists. Jeremy (talk) 10:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge List of railway bridges and viaducts in Hong Kong into List of tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong. Klbrain (talk) 15:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

---

I suggest that List of railway bridges and viaducts in Hong Kong be merged into List of tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong, as there is no need for separate lists. 70.24.251.71 (talk) 04:32, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose. There are other similar lists such as List of railway bridges and viaducts in the United Kingdom. 218.250.159.95 (talk) 01:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

• Support as both lists are pretty short (which the UK list is not). Pinut (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

• Oppose. Length is not that relevant. The railway list should be expanded to cover tunnels, e.g. Beacon Hill and Tai Lam. Jeremy (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

• Support It's not fair that Jeremy voted twice! 203.184.138.132 (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

• Support Both lists are similar, so I suggest merging.

203.184.138.132 (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.202.194.220 (talk)

• Support Both lists are almost the same. Agreeing to emerge both pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leroyhung (talk • contribs) 07:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of tunnels and bridges in Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110828221817/http://nosheep.net/story/worlds-largest-railroad-viaduct/ to http://nosheep.net/story/worlds-largest-railroad-viaduct/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cedd.gov.hk/eng/publications/newsletter/doc/cedd_newsletter_30.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)