Talk:List of vetos exercised by the US government in the UN Security Council
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions |
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 November 2016. The result of the discussion was merge to List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Table formatting
editThe formatting and columns of the table edits in September and October 2016 has made it very difficult to read, with a combination of edits to the wikitable syntax and trying to add additional content which doesn't line up with previous columns. Please discuss the changes here and possibly make edits in a WP:SANDBOX before changing the table in the article. Other editors may be able to assist with making the changes while maintaining the table structure. — MrDolomite • Talk 13:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.20.85.7 (talk)
Merger discussion for List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions and United States and the United Nations
editAn article that you have been involved in editing—List of vetos exercised by the US government in the UN Security Council—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you.
- I do not think that the two articles should be merged. They do not address the same issues. This article is not limited to the explicit uses of the veto, but acknowledges rather the use of US international influence to stop resolutions from passing. This should be made more clear in the article. The article has also been justly criticized for being editorialized. If these issues are addressed then there is no reason the article could not exist independently. However, I do not think that a merge is the solution. Auguel (talk) 17:49, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Please vote here. 177.182.217.236 (talk) 15:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- AfD is not a vote. I've seen the AfD only now, but its output needs to be implemented better: just removing information is not a merge. Nemo 08:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Please vote here. 177.182.217.236 (talk) 15:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of vetos exercised by the US government in the UN Security Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120616215106/http://www.bfsweb.org/onemillion/09%20One%20in%20a%20Million%20-%20The%20Extent%20of%20Fluoridation.pdf to http://www.bfsweb.org/onemillion/09%20One%20in%20a%20Million%20-%20The%20Extent%20of%20Fluoridation.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)