Talk:List of virtual communities with more than 1 million users

Latest comment: 3 months ago by 74.62.206.2 in topic Should this page be deleted?

What qualifies as a social networking website here?

edit

For example should question-and-answer sites like Quora and Gutefrage.net be included?

The title says virtual communities and the text social networking website so there's also some ambiguity here.

--Fixuture (talk) 23:15, 9 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

I was also a bit confused. Do all these sites have a newsfeed allowing interactions with others in the community? I was surprised to not find YouTube, Pinterest, TripAdvisor, SoundCloud. Even interest-based ones like Ultimate Guitar, Strava or Chess.com are missing here. Ibibo is a company - it has nothing to do with communities. I shall go ahead and remove the same. BhaskarNS (talk) 10:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 11 external links on List of virtual communities with more than 1 million users. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of virtual communities with more than 1 million users. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Progressive discussion

edit

Hello, One quite interesting aspect of progressive discussion on important topis would have to be the simplification of term to a base level ; there for most everyone can under tandem and accomplish MI or progression on extremely important issues and topics. Doppler91012 (talk) 22:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of virtual communities with more than 1 million users. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sort by number of registered users

edit

It would make sense for this list to default to sorting by the number of registered users in descending order. Currently, the table defaults to sorting alphabetically by name. Is there an easy way to change this? -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't look like there's an easy way to do this. See WP:TABLESORT: When users are first presented with a table, the rows will always appear in the same order as in the wikitext. If you want a table to appear sorted by a certain column, you must sort the wikitext itself in that order. Ahiijny (talk) 20:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

List status & outdatedness

edit

While interesting, the list is hugely outdated. Some communities listed here have been defunct for almost a decade, some of the newer communities are not even included (I just had to add Instagram with 2B users...). The question is: does this list represent an archive of communities or a current overview? If the former, 'active users' should be converted to 'highest number of users' or something similar. If the latter, the list needs to be filtered for defunct communities and many of the stats need to be updated. Also: the Alexa column might be removed, since Alexa is about to be dismantled (May 2022). --Gummbahla (talk) 10:25, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Alexa Rank Shut down May 1, 2023

edit

I've just added Avaaz, a community with over 69 million members. I was unable to include the Alexa rank because the service shut down.

https://www.theverge.com/2021/12/9/22825744/amazon-retiring-alexa-web-ranking-sevice YQUVWynjszHUwDzv (talk) 19:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia or Wikimedia?

edit

Shouldn’t our community be on this list too? Onceinawhile (talk) 20:33, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Should this page be deleted?

edit

This is a list of "Virtual Communities" but it seems to be a list of social media related websites. If it was virtual communities there would be 17 discord servers and 698 subreddits on this list. Those would match the definition of a virtual community with over 1M users. As the list stands now, many of the entries are websites are just social media, not necessarily a singular virtual community. In addition, much of the user count numbers were grabbed in the early 2010s and are likely unrelated to up to date numbers. All that along with many of the current sites on the list having shut down and untold many websites that need to be added to the list. I do not think this is a feasible or relevant page. And why is the Alexa ranking still being used after it was shut down years ago? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.62.206.2 (talk) 20:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply