Talk:List of works produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions

Loopy De Loop

Whoever is editing this article needs to get their facts and standards corrected. If you insist on putting that Loopy was distributed by Columbia you need to mention that it is no longer distributed by them and in in the HB library owned by Warner Brothers. If you don't want any mention of it then you clearly need to remove the reference to it ever being distributed by Columbia as that is outdated.

You can go find multiple sources from Warner Brothers' Archive program that they own Loopy de Loop and are going to eventually release it on DVD, anyone who still thinks putting it as being distributed by Columbia is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.47 (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

This is an encyclopedia, not a corporate asset guide or a buyers' guide. Loopy De Loop was produced for and distributed by Columbia Pictures. It is of no concern to an article listing Hanna-Barbera programs to determine who owns what and who puts what out on DVD; that information belongs in the individual articles. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 00:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Agree. Not sure what the imporatance of whether a certain cartoon is completely available on DVD, half available, or not at all. A 50 sec look on Amazon or Google can tell you this. My guess is that this info has always been this person's pet project. Although it is obviously important to him/her, it has no real value to the general audience... Ckruschke (talk) 06:32, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Ckruschke

Due tell us what your "general audience" is then? People who don't want information or accurate up to date findings? That is the impression that user seems to want to persist on. I was not the one who added the DVD information. But i was the one who made sure to put which products are now/not owned by WB. I'm not sure what actual purpose you see in gutting that information. The other user seems to not know much of what he is talking about given that the DVD release page on this "encyclopedia" was already deleted long ago and there has never been a page about the current holdings. where do you prose said information goes? You have gutted any indications of caring where any program is now held by and given no place to accurately put it? I'm sorry but the general public is clearly going to not gain anything from a page that wrongly lists in some cases the proper distributors. I'm not surprised given how much wrong information was on many of these pages that could have been fixed if some wikipedians actually did appropriate research, but given the attitude of the last user, i doubt many of them know what the "general audience" or an encyclopedia mean at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.47 (talk) 09:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

That's not at all a civil tone. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 12:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of works produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.allmovie.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&sql=2:93352~T3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of works produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060426195934/http://www.allmovie.com:80/cg/avg.dll?p=avg to http://www.allmovie.com/cg/avg.dll?p=avg&sql=2:93352~T3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of works produced by Hanna-Barbera Productions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515161203/http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/TV/03/23/obit.hanna/index.html to http://archives.cnn.com/2001/SHOWBIZ/TV/03/23/obit.hanna/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Hanna-Barbera Diamond Collection

Hanna-Barbera Classic Collection now is moved into Diamond Collection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.215.209.121 (talk) 01:01, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

DVDs

Why are DVD sets listed here? Those are just collections of works, not new works themselves. Trivialist (talk) 22:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Digital ink and paint

I keep reverting edits from users claiming this show and that show are the first Hanna-Barbera shows to use digital ink and paint. I've not been able to find the proper references that list the exact first shows (which are The New Scooby-Doo Mysteries and The Jetsons - the latter being the first to properly credit computer animation system developer Marc Levoy), but every "first" I've seen listed here was an incorrect guess or presumption. Here is a reference for the development of H-B's pioneering digital ink and paint system in the early 1980s; if anyone can find any references specific to New Scooby-Doo Mysteries or Jetsons, then those can be properly listed as "first digital ink and painted productions". It isn't Powerpuff Girls or Jonny Bravo. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 18:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

"Complete list of works produced by Hanna-Barbera" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complete list of works produced by Hanna-Barbera. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete list of works produced by Hanna-Barbera until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 12:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

R&R and QDM

Someone is removing Ruff and Reddy and Quick Draw Mcgraw Show from this page. I dont know why but they are falsely taking them down here and messing the page up.

Please put it back up. They have no reason to keep doing that. Tropetroop29 (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Not everything produced by Hanna-Barbera is owned by Warner Bros.

There should be a list of these notes:

^P The rights are currently owned by Paramount Pictures.

^U The rights are currently owned by Universal Pictures.

^D The rights are currently owned by The Walt Disney Company.

^S The rights are currently owned by Sony Pictures.

^M The rights are currently owned by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

FlapjackRulez (talk) 21:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Per WP:OSE, a lot of the other productions at the time, including DePatie-Freleng do not have these either, so it's not super necessary, but if you want, feel free to do it yourself should you wish. Not a bad idea. CartoonnewsCP (talk) 23:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

I don't see the point; it adds unnecessary detail that's of limited interest. Trivialist (talk) 01:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)