Talk:Literature and Science

It would be interesting to see articles develop on this topic. It's a crucial relationship (one of close collaboration or rejection), especially perhaps since the nineteenth century. Mike Wetherill

Fair use rationale for Image:LiteratureandScience3.jpg

Image:LiteratureandScience3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Documentation provided in a newly added book infobox, in the judgment of this editor, conforms to presentations of covers for other books with their own Wikipedia articles. I hope this addition satisfactorily resolves any concerns regarding fair use of the image of the book cover. Also, content added in the last few days, in the judgment of this editor, is sufficient to raise the article quality above prior "stub" class. Canhelp (talk) 01:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)