Talk:LittleBigPlanet (2008 video game)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Overall I find this a very good article, although a bit long at some parts. There's a ton of changes in the edit history this week so it might be a bit unstable.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   As far as I can tell, yes.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   I'm missing a critism section though, if there is any.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Lot of (constructive) changes in the last week.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I'm going to request another opinion on this one, since this is a quite popular article and I'm no review expert. --MrStalker ^(talk) 10:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

   Passed :D Just keep up the good work! Also consider doing a GA review of your own. --MrStalker ^(talk) 15:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I'm happy to over a second opinion, I'll just review it and get back to you shortly. \ / (⁂) 01:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Gone through the article, and I would have no problems in passing the article. Apart from the first line, which needs a little rewording, the article is satisfactory. I also believe the stability relates to edit wars and content disputes, not necessarily good faith improvements. \ / (⁂) 02:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

As a fairly regular editor on this article, I just wanted to point out in response to "Fair representation without bias: I'm missing a criticism section though, if there is any." I thought Criticism sections were generally discouraged? Instead, this article's Reception section offers a balanced account of the coverage the game has received, good and bad. Thanks for the feedback. ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 09:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I don't know actually. I've just seen it in a lot of other articles. You're probably right. As I said, I'm no expert. --MrStalker ^(talk) 15:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)