Talk:Little CMS
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIn an attempt to establish some reference, just a couple of links to the sourceforge page and mailing lists hosted on sourceforge (can now also be reached from the main homepage):
http://sourceforge.net/projects/lcms/
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=1912&max_rows=25&style=nested&viewmonth=200206
plus a couple of other links that also mentions LittleCMS in context with other Open Source CMSes:
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/LittleCMS
http://www.oyranos.org/wiki/index.php?title=ColourMatchingModuls
Notability / cleanup
editI just took my first look at this article and seems someone put {{notability}} there.
I think LCMS passes WP:SOFTWARE criteria pretty well:
- It's one of the few widely used CMS libraries used in open source world,
- It's used by many notable packages such as GIMP and Scribus (as far as I know),
- By those virtues, it's also included in many Linux distributions. In Debian, it's as liblcms1, and as of writing is ranked #188 in popcon by install count, out of 56013 packages, which means it's pretty darn important if you ask me =)
The article needs cleanup though to remove somewhat rambling tone and a bit clumsy language - and also explain the notability. I'll be tagging it accordingly and will, time permitting, look at how this thing could be improved shortly. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Comment
editFeel free to clean it up... I did the rambling tone and added the clumsy language, although I did so in a sincere attempt to quickly establish a few credible references, due to the questioned notability of LCMS. Apologies for not being able to express myself eloquently in English, which is not my mother tongue ;-) Maybe I should just add a proper page on LCMS in Danish... -- Per.
Usage
editIn the list of apps/software that use Little CMS" shouldn't also Ghostscript be mentioned? Toddcs (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Little CMS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060522004224/http://www.tkupfer.de/imaging/Scan_Profiling.html to http://www.tkupfer.de/imaging/Scan_Profiling.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)