This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Little Thetford flesh-hook received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
A fact from Little Thetford flesh-hook appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article relates to the British Museum. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one, as needed.British MuseumWikipedia:GLAM/British MuseumTemplate:WikiProject British MuseumBritish Museum-related articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is now in both Category:Bronze Age Britain and Category:Bronze Age Europe. The article's creator, Senra, put it in "Europe"; I added "Britain", since it's a British artefact, and I removed "Europe" as overcategorisation per Wikipedia:Categorization. However, Senra tells me that archaeologists classify this as a specifically European Bronze Age artefact; therefore, I've restored "Europe" per WP:IAR. Right now, "Britain" is serving to categorise this artefact by its location, while "Europe" is serving to categorise it by cultural affiliation. Please see the final section of Senra's talk page as of this edit for a more detailed discussion of why this categorisation is appropriate. Nyttend (talk) 17:19, 2 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The spelling of Artefact in this British English article is correct, according to American and British English spelling differences. Please respect WP:ENGVAR. In particular, Latin arte + factum; see also artefacto (Spanish), artefacto (Portuguese), artefatto (Italian), and artefakt (German). For balance, in British English, J Dalrymple (1681)—Artifact, J Jamieson (1825)—Artifact , and not until S T Colleridge (1834)—Artefact.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The word "stail" is fairly obsure, at least in American English (it's not even in my spell-checker), so I've replaced it with "handle" for clarity. (But not in the direct OED quote, of course.) If a later editor disagrees, it would be good to at least keep "handle" in a parenthetical. Phasma Felis (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}