Talk:Lituanica
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think there should be three articles: Steponas Darius, Stasys Girenas and modified current article with details about their flight (possibly renamed to "transatlantic flight of Darius and Girenas" or something). Similar thing is with Alcock and Brown. Pibwl 2 July 2005 14:42 (UTC)
Agreed this should be merged into one article!!!
editAgreed this should be merged into one article!!!
Topic mismatch
editThe article is clearly not about the pilots but about the airplane, flight and the reasons of the crash. I think it should be just renamed into Lituanica, as is done in the Lithuanian version. Audriusa 21:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
i disagree, in order to know about the plane you have to know who felew it, and if they were experenced. like what if the pilots had no expereance, they would have crashed, so knowing about pilots experece tells me that it wasent becasue of expereance
Lithuanian-American, or American with lithuanian descent?
editDarius and Girėnas were both born in Lithuania and migrated to USA with their families. That means they were lithuanians (although they got United State's cityzenship), and not american with lithuanian descent. I edited the item. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.84.0.80 (talk) 15:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC).
They are not AMERICAN, THEY ARE LITHUANIAN.
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 01:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Lituanica.jpg
editImage:Lituanica.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:Lituanica.jpg
editImage:Lituanica.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Lituanica supermarkets?
editI came here expecting an article about the chain of supermarkets which specialises in goods from eastern Europe and has numerous stores across the UK and other countries. There doesn't seem to be such an article which is surprising because of the size of the company.--109.113.28.121 (talk) 20:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Because a chain of supermarkets is clearly much more relevant and important than historic transatlantic flight. /s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.219.87.28 (talk) 13:07, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lituanica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051216082656/http://discovery.ot.lt/cfair97/biodar.htm to http://discovery.ot.lt/cfair97/biodar.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 4 January 2018 (UTC)