Talk:Live. Love. ASAP

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:LiveLoveA$AP/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):
   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):
   b (citations to reliable sources):
   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):
   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Infobox

• No issues

Lead

• LiveLoveA$AP is the debut mixtape by American rapper A$AP Rocky... → Have the sentence end here to comply with WP:BEGINNING
• Allmusic editor Andre Barnes dubs LiveLoveA$AP "the antithesis of conscious rap" and a "guilty pleasure" for hip hop purists.[1] → Put general attitude of reviewers toward the album, not just one

Background

• In August, Rocky followed with "Peso"... → Specify year

Composition

• No issues

Release and promotion

• No issues

Reception

• No issues

Track listing

• No issues

Personnel

• No issues

Release history

• Make sure to include sources to verify all of this information

References

• Put the references into two separate columns to make it more organized

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. There are some minor issues that are keeping the article from reaching good article status. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

RE:

• All album articles on Wikipedia, particularly the ones passed through GA/FA, have the first sentence as is, with the release date and label at the end. Although there's nothing about external consistency among articles in any guidelines, I don't see what WP:Beginning says that it should be otherwise, and since it's a release, it kind of suits that subject of the article.
• Revised reviewer statement.
• Specified year.
• Reverted editor who added "Release history".
• + sep. columns. Dan56 (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

According to WP:BEGINNING, "If possible, the page title should be the subject of the first sentence." Therefore, in this instance, it should say what number of album it is and who it is written by. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 20:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Doesnt "debut" indicate what number it is? Dan56 (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, "debut" does indicate what album it is for an artist. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 21:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Anything else? Dan56 (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 17:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)